Current practice of assessing students’ sustainability competencies: a review of tools

Современная практика оценки компетенций студентов в области устойчивого развития: обзор инструментов
Aaron Redman, Arnim Wiek, Matthias Barth
2020-09-01

assessment toolscompetency assessmenthigher educationsustainability competenciessystematic literature review
Abstract While there is growing agreement on the competencies sustainability professionals should possess as well as the pedagogies to develop them, the practice of assessing students’ sustainability competencies is still in its infancy. Despite growing interest among researchers, there has not yet been a systematic review of how students’ sustainability competencies are currently assessed. This review article responds to this need by examining what tools are currently used for assessing students’ sustainability competencies to inform future practice. A systematic literature review was conducted for publications through the end of 2019, resulting in 75 relevant studies that detail the use of an assessment tool. We analyzed the described tools regarding their main features, strengths and weaknesses, as well as potential improvements. Based on this analysis, we first propose a typology of eight assessment tools, which fall into three meta-types: self-perceiving, observation, and test-based approaches, providing specific examples of practice for all tools. We then articulate strengths and weaknesses as well as potential improvements for each tool (type). This study structures the field of sustainability competency assessment, provides a criteria-based overview of the currently used tools, and highlights promising future developments. For the practice, it provides guidance to sustainability (science) instructors, researchers, and program directors who are interested in using competencies assessment tools in more informed ways.
1
A systematic review identified 75 studies published through 2019 that used tools to assess students’ sustainability competencies.
2
Assessment practice remains in its infancy despite growing agreement about sustainability competencies and pedagogies for developing them.
3
The analysis compares each tool’s main features, strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements, providing examples of current assessment practice.
4
The review proposes a typology of eight assessment tools grouped into three meta-types: self-perceiving, observation, and test-based approaches.
5
The study structures the emerging field and offers criteria-based guidance for instructors, researchers, and program directors selecting sustainability competency assessment tools.

students’ sustainability competencies

current assessment practices, tools, and their strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-09-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Aaron Redman
Arnim Wiek
Matthias Barth
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%