Regenerative endodontics: a comprehensive review

Регенеративная эндодонтия: комплексный обзор
Ásgeir Sigurðsson, Louis M. Lin, Bill Kahler, S. G. Kim, Matthew Malek
2018-05-19

endogenous stem cellsimmature teethpulp regenerationregenerative endodonticstissue engineering
The European Society of Endodontology and the American Association for Endodontists have released position statements and clinical considerations for regenerative endodontics. There is increasing literature on this field since the initial reports of Iwaya et al. (Dental Traumatology, 17, 2001, 185) and Banchs & Trope (Journal of Endodontics, 30, 2004, 196). Endogenous stem cells from an induced periapical bleeding and scaffolds using blood clot, platelet rich plasma or platelet-rich fibrin have been utilized in regenerative endodontics. This approach has been described as a 'paradigm shift' and considered the first treatment option for immature teeth with pulp necrosis. There are three treatment outcomes of regenerative endodontics; (i) resolution of clinical signs and symptoms; (ii) further root maturation; and (iii) return of neurogenesis. It is known that results are variable for these objectives, and true regeneration of the pulp/dentine complex is not achieved. Repair derived primarily from the periodontal and osseous tissues has been shown histologically. It is hoped that with the concept of tissue engineering, namely stem cells, scaffolds and signalling molecules, that true pulp regeneration is an achievable goal. This review discusses current knowledge as well as future directions for regenerative endodontics. Patient-centred outcomes such as tooth discolouration and possibly more appointments with the potential for adverse effects needs to be discussed with patients and parents. Based on the classification of Cvek (Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, 8, 1992, 45), it is proposed that regenerative endodontics should be considered for teeth with incomplete root formation although teeth with near or complete root formation may be more suited for conventional endodontic therapy or MTA barrier techniques. However, much is still not known about clinical and biological aspects of regenerative endodontics.
1
Clinical outcomes comprise symptom resolution, continued root maturation, and possible neurogenesis, but results are variable across these objectives.
2
Histological evidence indicates that current procedures primarily produce repair from periodontal and osseous tissues rather than true pulp–dentine complex regeneration.
3
Potential patient-centered disadvantages, including tooth discoloration, additional appointments, and adverse effects, should be discussed with patients and parents.
4
Regenerative endodontics is proposed mainly for immature teeth, whereas teeth with near-complete or complete root formation may be better suited to conventional therapy or MTA barrier techniques.
5
Regenerative endodontics uses endogenous stem cells recruited through induced periapical bleeding and scaffolds such as blood clot, platelet-rich plasma, or platelet-rich fibrin.
6
Tissue engineering combining stem cells, scaffolds, and signaling molecules may enable genuine pulp regeneration, but substantial clinical and biological uncertainties remain.

Regenerative endodontic treatment of immature teeth with pulp necrosis

Clinical and biological outcomes, limitations, and future directions of pulp–dentine regeneration, including symptom resolution, root maturation, neurogenesis, and tissue-engineering strategies

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-05-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ásgeir Sigurðsson
Louis M. Lin
Bill Kahler
S. G. Kim
Matthew Malek
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%