Trade Credit Insurance: Operational Value and Contract Choice

Страхование торговых кредитов: операционная ценность и выбор типа договора
S. Alex Yang, Nitin Bakshi, Christopher J. Chen
2020-07-01

cancelable contractscash flow smoothingcreditworthiness monitoringnoncancelable contractstrade credit insurance
Trade credit insurance (TCI) is a risk management tool commonly used by suppliers to guarantee against payment default by credit buyers. TCI contracts can be either cancelable (the insurer has the discretion to cancel this guarantee during the insured period) or noncancelable (the terms cannot be renegotiated within the insured period). This paper identifies two roles of TCI: the (cash flow) smoothing role (smoothing the supplier’s cash flows) and the monitoring role (tracking the buyer’s continued creditworthiness after contracting, which enables the supplier to make efficient operational decisions regarding whether to ship goods to the credit buyer). We further explore which contracts better facilitate these two roles of TCI by modeling the strategic interaction between the insurer and the supplier. Noncancelable contracts rely on the deductible to implement both roles, which may result in a conflict: a high deductible inhibits the smoothing role, whereas a low deductible weakens the monitoring role. Under cancelable contracts, the insurer’s cancelation action ensures that the information acquired is reflected in the supplier’s shipping decision. Thus, the insurer has adequate incentives to perform its monitoring function without resorting to a high deductible. Despite this advantage, we find that the insurer may exercise the cancelation option too aggressively; this thereby restores a preference for noncancelable contracts, especially when the supplier’s outside option is unattractive and the insurer’s monitoring cost is low. Noncancelable contracts are also relatively more attractive when the acquired information is verifiable than when it is unverifiable. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.
1
Cancelable contracts let insurers transmit monitoring information through cancellation, providing monitoring incentives without requiring high deductibles.
2
Insurers may cancel too aggressively under cancelable contracts, making noncancelable contracts preferable when suppliers’ outside options are unattractive and monitoring costs are low.
3
Noncancelable contracts become relatively more attractive when acquired credit information is verifiable rather than unverifiable.
4
Noncancelable contracts use deductibles to implement both functions, creating a trade-off because high deductibles impair smoothing while low deductibles weaken monitoring.
5
Trade credit insurance provides two operational functions: smoothing suppliers’ cash flows and monitoring buyers’ post-contract creditworthiness.

Trade credit insurance contracts between insurers and suppliers for covering credit-buyer payment default

The operational value and choice between cancelable and noncancelable contracts for cash-flow smoothing, buyer-creditworthiness monitoring, and suppliers’ shipping decisions under strategic insurer–supplier interaction

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
S. Alex Yang
Nitin Bakshi
Christopher J. Chen
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%