Problematising participatory video with youth in C anada: the intersection of therapeutic, deficit and individualising discourses

Проблематизация партисипаторного видео с участием молодежи в Канаде: пересечение терапевтического, дефицитарного и индивидуализирующего дискурсов
Matt Rogers
2014-11-25

critical discourse analysiscritical participatory researchdeficit discoursesindividualising discoursesparticipatory video
This paper draws on critical discourse analysis to explore power dynamics in a participatory video project that took place in an alternative education centre inNewBrunswick,Canada. The paper addresses growing concerns at the paucity of critical scholarship devoted to participatory video research. Often championed for its democratic, critical and counter‐hegemonic potential, participatory video has steadily gained favour in academic, developmental and educational contexts. However, practitioners implementing participatory approaches often fail to engage with issues of power. This oversight has meant that taken‐for‐granted assumptions about participatory video have often gone unquestioned. Appreciating this concern, this paper explores how power operates through individualising and deficit discourses in participatory video work with youth and how these discourses might reinforce oppressive thinking, consequently adversely impacting those who participate. This critique accents the importance of challenging taken‐for‐granted assumptions about participatory video by showing how the method can be shaped by, and play into, marginalising discourses. For practitioners, this is a reminder that power operates through all research and educational practices – even those claiming to be participatory, critical and counter‐hegemonic. The paper adds to a growing body of scholarship that draws attention to complexities associated with participatory video and relocates it within the framework of critical participatory research.
1
Critical discourse analysis of a participatory video project in a Canadian alternative education centre reveals how power operates within ostensibly participatory practices.
2
Individualising, deficit and therapeutic discourses shaped the participatory video work with youth and could reinforce oppressive interpretations of participants.
3
Participatory video’s democratic, critical and counter-hegemonic potential cannot be assumed, because practitioners may overlook embedded power relations.
4
The method can be shaped by and reproduce marginalising discourses, potentially adversely affecting participating youth.
5
The paper situates participatory video within critical participatory research and calls for greater attention to power in research and educational practice.

participatory video work with youth in an alternative education centre in New Brunswick, Canada

the operation of power through therapeutic, deficit and individualising discourses and their potential to reinforce oppressive and marginalising thinking

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-11-25
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Matt Rogers
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%