Contested Mergers and Equilibrium Antitrust Policy
Оспариваемые слияния и антимонопольная политика равновесия
1993-04-01
SCID: 54.1/wjfnd6xs
Discuss with AI
1992 Merger Guidelinesantitrust lawscompetitive conditionseconomic analysismerger enforcement policy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Although the Guidelines should improve the predictability of the Agency's merger enforcement policy, it is not possible to remove the exercise of judgement from the evaluation of mergers under the antitrust laws. Because the specific standards set forth in the Guidelines must be applied to a broad range of possible factural circumstances, mechanical application of those standards may provide misleading answers to the economic questions raised under the antitrust laws. Moreover, information is often incomplete and the picture of competitive conditions that develops from historical evidence may provide an incomplete answer to the forward-looking inquiry of the Guidelines. Therefore, the Agency will apply the standards of the Guidelines reasonably and flexibly to the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed mermer—1992 Merger Guidelines.
Key Findings
1
Antitrust agencies should apply merger standards reasonably and flexibly to the specific facts and circumstances of each proposed merger.
2
Incomplete information and reliance on historical evidence may inadequately characterize future competitive conditions.
3
Mechanical application of guideline standards can mislead because mergers present diverse factual circumstances and complex economic questions.
4
Merger Guidelines improve enforcement predictability but cannot eliminate agency judgment in evaluating proposed mergers.
Research Object
proposed mergers evaluated under antitrust laws
Research Subject
the application of merger-enforcement standards under incomplete information and uncertain competitive conditions
Publication Details
Publication Date
1993-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest