Entry Restrictions, Industry Evolution, and Dynamic Efficiency: Evidence From Commercial Banking
Ограничения на вход, эволюция отрасли и динамическая эффективность: данные по коммерческим банкам
1998-04-01
SCID: 54.1/wm8b8vbu
Discuss with AI
bank performancebranching deregulationinterstate bankingloan lossesoperating costs
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This article shows that bank performance improves significantly after restrictions on bank expansion are lifted. We find that operating costs and loan losses decrease sharply after states permit statewide branching and, to a lesser extent, after states allow interstate banking. The improvements following branching deregulation appear to occur because better banks grow at the expense of their less efficient rivals. By retarding the “natural” evolution of the industry, branching restrictions reduced the performance of the average banking asset. We also find that most of the reduction in banks' costs were passed along to bank borrowers in the form of lower loan rates.
Key Findings
1
Bank performance improves significantly after restrictions on geographic expansion are lifted, especially following statewide branching deregulation.
2
Banks passed most of their cost reductions to borrowers through lower loan rates.
3
Branching restrictions delayed the industry’s natural evolution and reduced the performance of the average banking asset.
4
Deregulation appears to improve efficiency because better-performing banks expand at the expense of less efficient competitors.
5
Operating costs and loan losses decrease sharply after states permit statewide branching, with smaller improvements after interstate banking is allowed.
Research Object
U.S. commercial banking industry under state branching and interstate banking restrictions
Research Subject
The effects of lifting entry and expansion restrictions on bank performance, industry evolution, dynamic efficiency, operating costs, loan losses, and borrower loan rates
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest