Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda

Почему Китай допускает более свободные социальные сети? Протесты против слежки и пропаганды
Yanhui Wu, Bei Qin, David Strömberg
2017-01-30

Chinese social mediaSina Weibocorruption allegationsonline censorshippolitical protests
In this paper, we document basic facts regarding public debates about controversial political issues on Chinese social media. Our documentation is based on a dataset of 13.2 billion blog posts published on Sina Weibo—the most prominent Chinese microblogging platform—during the 2009–2013 period. Our primary finding is that a shockingly large number of posts on highly sensitive topics were published and circulated on social media. For instance, we find millions of posts discussing protests, and these posts are informative in predicting the occurrence of specific events. We find an even larger number of posts with explicit corruption allegations, and that these posts predict future corruption charges of specific individuals. Our findings challenge a popular view that an authoritarian regime would relentlessly censor or even ban social media. Instead, the interaction of an authoritarian government with social media seems more complex.
1
China’s interaction with social media appears to involve a more complex balance among public protests, surveillance, and propaganda.
2
Even more posts contained explicit corruption allegations, which predicted subsequent corruption charges against specific individuals.
3
Millions of social-media posts discussed protests, and their content helped predict the occurrence of specific protest events.
4
The findings challenge the view that authoritarian governments relentlessly censor or ban social media.
5
The study analyzes 13.2 billion Sina Weibo posts published between 2009 and 2013 to document political debate in China.

Public debates about controversial political issues on Chinese social media, particularly Sina Weibo posts published during 2009–2013

The prevalence, circulation, and predictive value of posts about protests and corruption allegations under authoritarian censorship, surveillance, and propaganda

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-01-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yanhui Wu
Bei Qin
David Strömberg
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%