Positive and negative survivor-specific psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer: the DCCSS-LATER 2 psycho-oncology study

Положительные и отрицательные психосоциальные последствия детского рака, специфичные для выживших: психоонкологическое исследование DCCSS-LATER 2
Anne Maas, Heleen Maurice‐Stam, Alied M. van der Aa‐van Delden, Elvira C van Dalen, Eline van Dulmen‐den Broeder, Wim J. E. Tissing, Jacqueline J. Loonen, Helena J. H. van der Pal, Andrica C. H. de Vries, Marry M. van den Heuvel‐Eibrink, Geert O. Janssens, Cécile M. Ronckers, Sebastian Neggers, Dorine Bresters, Marloes Louwerens, Birgitta Versluys, Margriet van der Heiden‐van der Loo, Leontien C.M. Kremer, Marloes van Gorp, Martha A. Grootenhuis, on behalf of the Dutch LATER study group
2023-05-11

Benefit & Burden ScaleDCCSS-LATER cohortImpact of Cancer-Childhood Cancerchildhood cancer survivorssurvivor-specific psychosocial consequences
PURPOSE: Numerous studies investigated generic psychosocial outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer (CCS). The present study aimed to describe survivor-specific psychosocial consequences in CCS, and to identify socio-demographic and medical associated factors. METHODS: CCS from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS)-LATER cohort (diagnosed 1963-2001) part 2 (age ≥ 18 years, diagnosed < 18 years, ≥ 5 years since diagnosis) completed the Benefit & Burden Scale (BBSC) and the Impact of Cancer-Childhood Cancer (IOC-CS). Items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5). We examined outcomes with descriptive statistics, and socio-demographic and medical associated factors with regression analyses, corrected for multiple testing (p < 0.004). RESULTS: CCS, N = 1713, age mean (M) 36 years, 49% female, ≥ 15 years since diagnosis, participated. On average, CCS reported 'somewhat' Benefit (M = 2.9), and 'not at all' to 'a little' Burden (M = 1.5) of childhood cancer. Average scores on IOC-CS' positive impact scales ranged from 2.5 (Personal Growth) to 4.1 (Socializing), and on the negative impact scales from 1.4 (Financial Problems) to 2.4 (Thinking/Memory). Apart from cognitive problems, CCS reported challenges as worries about relationship status, fertility, and how cancer had affected siblings. Female sex was associated with more Personal Growth, and more negative impact. CCS more highly educated, partnered, and employed had higher positive and lower negative impact. CCS older at diagnosis reported more positive impact. CNS tumor survivors and those who had head/cranium radiotherapy had higher negative impact. CNS tumor survivors reported less positive impact. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The majority of CCS reported positive impact of cancer while most CCS reported little negative impact. While this may indicate resiliency in most CCS, health care providers should be aware that they can also experience survivor-specific challenges that warrant monitoring/screening, information provision and psychosocial support.
1
Among 1,713 adult childhood cancer survivors, the average perceived benefit of cancer was “somewhat” (M = 2.9), whereas perceived burden was low (M = 1.5).
2
CNS tumor history and head or cranial radiotherapy were associated with greater negative impact, while CNS tumor survivors reported less positive impact; overall, findings suggest resilience alongside survivor-specific challenges requiring monitoring.
3
Female sex was associated with greater personal growth and greater negative impact; higher education, partnership, and employment were associated with more positive and fewer negative impacts.
4
Positive survivor-specific impacts ranged from Personal Growth (M = 2.5) to Socializing (M = 4.1), while negative impacts ranged from Financial Problems (M = 1.4) to Thinking/Memory difficulties (M = 2.4).
5
Survivors reported challenges involving cognitive problems, relationship status, fertility, and cancer’s effects on siblings.

Adult survivors of childhood cancer from the DCCSS-LATER cohort

Survivor-specific positive and negative psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer and their sociodemographic and medical associations

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-05-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
9
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Anne Maas
Heleen Maurice‐Stam
Alied M. van der Aa‐van Delden
Elvira C van Dalen
Eline van Dulmen‐den Broeder
Wim J. E. Tissing
Jacqueline J. Loonen
Helena J. H. van der Pal
Andrica C. H. de Vries
Marry M. van den Heuvel‐Eibrink
Geert O. Janssens
Cécile M. Ronckers
Sebastian Neggers
Dorine Bresters
Marloes Louwerens
Birgitta Versluys
Margriet van der Heiden‐van der Loo
Leontien C.M. Kremer
Marloes van Gorp
Martha A. Grootenhuis
on behalf of the Dutch LATER study group
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%