Positive and negative survivor-specific psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer: the DCCSS-LATER 2 psycho-oncology study
Положительные и отрицательные психосоциальные последствия детского рака, специфичные для выживших: психоонкологическое исследование DCCSS-LATER 2
2023-05-11
SCID: 54.1/wpefe4zu
Discuss with AI
Benefit & Burden ScaleDCCSS-LATER cohortImpact of Cancer-Childhood Cancerchildhood cancer survivorssurvivor-specific psychosocial consequences
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
PURPOSE: Numerous studies investigated generic psychosocial outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer (CCS). The present study aimed to describe survivor-specific psychosocial consequences in CCS, and to identify socio-demographic and medical associated factors. METHODS: CCS from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS)-LATER cohort (diagnosed 1963-2001) part 2 (age ≥ 18 years, diagnosed < 18 years, ≥ 5 years since diagnosis) completed the Benefit & Burden Scale (BBSC) and the Impact of Cancer-Childhood Cancer (IOC-CS). Items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5). We examined outcomes with descriptive statistics, and socio-demographic and medical associated factors with regression analyses, corrected for multiple testing (p < 0.004). RESULTS: CCS, N = 1713, age mean (M) 36 years, 49% female, ≥ 15 years since diagnosis, participated. On average, CCS reported 'somewhat' Benefit (M = 2.9), and 'not at all' to 'a little' Burden (M = 1.5) of childhood cancer. Average scores on IOC-CS' positive impact scales ranged from 2.5 (Personal Growth) to 4.1 (Socializing), and on the negative impact scales from 1.4 (Financial Problems) to 2.4 (Thinking/Memory). Apart from cognitive problems, CCS reported challenges as worries about relationship status, fertility, and how cancer had affected siblings. Female sex was associated with more Personal Growth, and more negative impact. CCS more highly educated, partnered, and employed had higher positive and lower negative impact. CCS older at diagnosis reported more positive impact. CNS tumor survivors and those who had head/cranium radiotherapy had higher negative impact. CNS tumor survivors reported less positive impact. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The majority of CCS reported positive impact of cancer while most CCS reported little negative impact. While this may indicate resiliency in most CCS, health care providers should be aware that they can also experience survivor-specific challenges that warrant monitoring/screening, information provision and psychosocial support.
Key Findings
1
Among 1,713 adult childhood cancer survivors, the average perceived benefit of cancer was “somewhat” (M = 2.9), whereas perceived burden was low (M = 1.5).
2
CNS tumor history and head or cranial radiotherapy were associated with greater negative impact, while CNS tumor survivors reported less positive impact; overall, findings suggest resilience alongside survivor-specific challenges requiring monitoring.
3
Female sex was associated with greater personal growth and greater negative impact; higher education, partnership, and employment were associated with more positive and fewer negative impacts.
4
Positive survivor-specific impacts ranged from Personal Growth (M = 2.5) to Socializing (M = 4.1), while negative impacts ranged from Financial Problems (M = 1.4) to Thinking/Memory difficulties (M = 2.4).
5
Survivors reported challenges involving cognitive problems, relationship status, fertility, and cancer’s effects on siblings.
Research Object
Adult survivors of childhood cancer from the DCCSS-LATER cohort
Research Subject
Survivor-specific positive and negative psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer and their sociodemographic and medical associations
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-05-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
9
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest