Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: moving forward

Города и выбросы парниковых газов: дальнейшее продвижение
Daniel Hoornweg, Lorraine Sugar, Claudia Lorena Trejos Gómez
2011-01-10

city-level emissionsgreenhouse gas emissionsper capita emissionsproduction- and consumption-based emissionsurban mitigation
Cities are blamed for the majority of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. So too are more affluent, highly urbanized countries. If all production-and consumption-based emissions that result from lifestyle and purchasing habits are included, urban residents and their associated affluence likely account for more than 80 per cent of the world’s GHG emissions. Attribution of GHG emissions should be refined. Apportioning responsibility can be misguided, as recent literature demonstrates that residents of denser city centres can emit half the GHG emissions of their suburban neighbours. It also fails to capture the enormous disparities within and across cities as emissions are lowest for poor cities and particularly low for the urban poor. This paper presents a detailed analysis of per capita GHG emissions for several large cities and a review of per capita emissions for 100 cities for which peer-reviewed studies are available. This highlights how average per capita GHG emissions for cities vary from more than 15 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) (Sydney, Calgary, Stuttgart and several major US cities) to less than half a tonne (various cities in Nepal, India and Bangladesh). The paper discusses where GHG emissions arise and where mitigation efforts may be most effective. It illustrates the need to obtain comparable estimates at city level and the importance of defining the scope of the analysis. Emissions for Toronto are presented at a neighbourhood level, city core level and metropolitan area level, and these are compared with provincial and national per capita totals. This shows that GHG emissions can vary noticeably for the same resident of a city or country depending on whether these are production- or consumption-based values. The methodologies and results presented form important inputs for policy development across urban sectors. The paper highlights the benefits and drawbacks of apportioning GHG emissions (and solid waste generation) per person. A strong correlation between high rates of GHG emissions and solid waste generation is presented. Policies that address both in concert may be more effective as they are both largely by-products of lifestyles.
1
Comparable city-level estimates and clearly defined analytical scopes are essential for identifying effective urban mitigation policies and interpreting per-person emissions responsibly.
2
Emission responsibility is highly uneven within cities: residents of dense city centres can emit half as much as their suburban neighbours, while urban poor populations have particularly low emissions.
3
GHG estimates for the same population can differ substantially depending on whether emissions are assigned using production- or consumption-based accounting and whether neighbourhood, city-core, metropolitan, provincial, or national boundaries are used.
4
Per-capita city emissions vary from over 15 tCO2e in cities including Sydney, Calgary, Stuttgart, and major US cities to under 0.5 tCO2e in cities across Nepal, India, and Bangladesh.
5
Urban residents and associated affluence may account for over 80% of global GHG emissions when production- and consumption-based lifestyle emissions are included.

Per capita greenhouse gas emissions of cities and urban residents across different spatial scales and accounting boundaries

Variation, attribution, and mitigation relevance of production- and consumption-based urban GHG emissions, including disparities within and across cities

Publication Details
Publication Date
2011-01-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Daniel Hoornweg
Lorraine Sugar
Claudia Lorena Trejos Gómez
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%