Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons
О народе, для народа и посредством народа: правовой пробел в регулировании синтетических лиц
2017-09-01
SCID: 54.1/wybrtt8s
Discuss with AI
AI legal personhoodEU legislationelectronic personslegal fictions of personhoodsynthetic entities
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Conferring legal personhood on purely synthetic entities is a very real legal possibility, one under consideration presently by the European Union. We show here that such legislative action would be morally unnecessary and legally troublesome. While AI legal personhood may have some emotional or economic appeal, so do many superficially desirable hazards against which the law protects us. We review the utility and history of legal fictions of personhood, discussing salient precedents where such fictions resulted in abuse or incoherence. We conclude that difficulties in holding “electronic persons” accountable when they violate the rights of others outweigh the highly precarious moral interests that AI legal personhood might protect.
Key Findings
1
Accountability problems arising when electronic persons violate others’ rights outweigh the precarious moral interests that AI personhood might protect.
2
Granting legal personhood to purely synthetic entities is legally possible and is currently under consideration by the European Union.
3
Historical and legal precedents indicate that legal fictions of personhood can produce abuse or doctrinal incoherence.
4
The paper argues that AI legal personhood is morally unnecessary despite its potential emotional or economic appeal.
Research Object
legal personhood for purely synthetic entities (AI “electronic persons”)
Research Subject
the moral necessity, legal coherence, and accountability implications of conferring personhood on AI
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-09-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest