Cyberstalking Perpetrators and Their Methods: A Systematic Literature Review
Податели киберсталкинга и их методы: систематический обзор литературы
2025-04-24
SCID: 54.1/x5bdwh62
Discuss with AI
account takeover and GPS trackingcyberstalking methodscyberstalking perpetratorsonline harassment via email social media textstalking motivations (revenge control reconciliation)
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The existing body of research on cyberstalking has identified the prevalent nature of this behavior, and the detrimental impact that cyberstalking has on victims and society. This systematic review aims to summarize literature on the perpetration of cyberstalking with two research questions: (a) Who are the perpetrators of cyberstalking? and (b) What are the methods of cyberstalking? Two literature databases (SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched for empirical research or literature reviews examining cyberstalking perpetration and/or methods. Following screening, 80 articles were identified and rated as highly relevant based on their applicability to the research questions. Perpetrators of cyberstalking were found to lack social skills, have low self-control, have experienced physical abuse victimization, endorsed stalking-related attitudes, and have higher rates of Internet use. Perpetrators were motivated by trying to reconcile a relationship, exact revenge, seek a relationship, or establish control over the victim. The most commonly reported methods of cyberstalking were unwanted and repeated online contact through email, social media, or text message. Other methods of cyberstalking include accessing the victim's accounts, tracking their GPS location, posing as the victim online, or contacting friends/family of the victim. The findings of this review highlight precursors to, and patterns of, cyberstalking perpetration, and future research is required to explore how existing "offline" stalking risk assessments and typologies can be applied to cases of cyberstalking, which would allow authorities to develop effective case management strategies.
Key Findings
1
Future research should assess applicability of offline stalking risk assessments and typologies to cyberstalking to inform case management strategies.
2
Most common methods are unwanted, repeated online contact via email, social media, or text message.
3
Other methods include accessing victims' accounts, tracking GPS location, impersonating victims online, and contacting victims' friends or family.
4
Perpetrators commonly exhibit poor social skills, low self-control, and higher overall Internet use.
5
Perpetrators have higher rates of prior physical abuse victimization and endorse stalking-related attitudes.
6
Primary motivations include reconciling a relationship, exacting revenge, seeking a relationship, and establishing control over the victim.
7
Systematic review of 80 relevant articles synthesizes perpetrator characteristics and methods of cyberstalking.
Research Object
Perpetrators of cyberstalking
Research Subject
Characteristics, motivations, and methods of cyberstalking perpetration (e.g., social skills, self-control, victimization history, stalking-related attitudes, Internet use, motives, and specific online behaviors such as unwanted repeated contact, account access, GPS tracking, impersonation, and contacting associates)
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-04-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
8
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai3
A systematic literature review on cyberstalking. An analysis of past achievements and future promises2020
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement2015
Stalking in the Twilight Zone: Extent of Cyberstalking Victimization and Offending Among College Students2011