Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Систематические картографические исследования в программной инженерии
2008-06-01
SCID: 54.1/x7drjf2a
Discuss with AI
classification schemeresearch field coveragesoftware engineeringsystematic mapping studiessystematic reviews
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: A software engineering systematic map is a defined method to build a classification scheme and structure a software engineering field of interest. The analysis of results focuses on frequencies of publications for categories within the scheme. Thereby, the coverage of the research field can be determined. Different facets of the scheme can also be combined to answer more specific research questions. OBJECTIVE: We describe how to conduct a systematic mapping study in software engineering and provide guidelines. We also compare systematic maps and systematic reviews to clarify how to chose between them. This comparison leads to a set of guidelines for systematic maps. METHOD: We have defined a systematic mapping process and applied it to complete a systematic mapping study. Furthermore, we compare systematic maps with systematic reviews by systematically analyzing existing systematic reviews. RESULTS: We describe a process for software engineering systematic mapping studies and compare it to systematic reviews. Based on this, guidelines for conducting systematic maps are defined. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic maps and reviews are different in terms of goals, breadth, validity issues and implications. Thus, they should be used complementarily and require different methods (e.g., for analysis).
Key Findings
1
A software engineering systematic map builds a classification scheme to structure a research field and quantify publication coverage across categories.
2
Combining classification facets enables systematic maps to answer more specific research questions about the distribution of software engineering research.
3
Systematic maps and systematic reviews differ in goals, breadth, validity concerns, and implications, requiring distinct analytical methods.
4
The paper defines and applies a systematic mapping process, then compares systematic maps with systematic reviews through analysis of existing reviews.
5
The paper provides guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies and recommends using maps and reviews complementarily.
Research Object
Systematic mapping studies in software engineering
Research Subject
the process, guidelines, and distinguishing characteristics of systematic mapping studies compared with systematic reviews
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-06-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest