Practical and Theoretical Issues in the Study of Heritage Language Acquisition
Практические и теоретические вопросы изучения усвоения унаследованного языка
2011-11-15
SCID: 54.1/x7sbra4n
Discuss with AI
differential object markingheritage language acquisitionlanguage inputmonolingual language learnerspartial acquisition
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
A promising source of insights into heritage language learning comes from the broader study of the role of input in language acquisition. We concentrate here on the possibility that qualitative differences in the proficiency of heritage and monolingual language learners can be traced to a qualitative difference in the input available to each group. By examining a series of representative phenomena (case, differential object marking, and disjunction), we illustrate how shortfalls in experience can shed light on the many instances of partial acquisition and of attrition that are reported in the literature on heritage language learning.
Key Findings
1
Analyses of case, differential object marking, and disjunction show how limited experience can produce partial acquisition in heritage speakers.
2
Heritage and monolingual learners may differ qualitatively in proficiency because they receive qualitatively different language input.
3
Input shortfalls may also explain reported instances of language attrition among heritage language learners.
4
The study argues that examining input in language acquisition provides a productive framework for understanding heritage-language outcomes.
Research Object
heritage language learners and monolingual language learners
Research Subject
the effects of qualitative differences and shortfalls in linguistic input on proficiency, partial acquisition, and attrition, illustrated through case, differential object marking, and disjunction
Publication Details
Publication Date
2011-11-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest