Optimizing Solvent-Assisted SAGD in Deep Extra-Heavy Oil Reservoirs: Mechanistic Insights and a Case Study in Liaohe

Оптимизация растворосодержащего SAGD в глубоких сверхтяжёлых нефтяных пластах: механистические выводы и пример из Ляохэ
Qi Jiang, Hongyuan Wang, Zhongyuan Wang, Tengfei Ma, Siyuan Huang, Simin Yang, Ying Zhou, Lifan Yue
2025-07-08

ES-SAGDExpanding Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainagedeep extra-heavy oil reservoirshexane co-injectionsteam quality reduction
This study investigates the feasibility and optimization of Expanding Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (ES-SAGD) in deep extra-heavy oil reservoirs, with a focus on the Shu 1-38-32 block in the Liaohe Basin. A modified theoretical model that accounts for steam quality reduction with increasing reservoir depth was applied to evaluate SAGD performance. The results demonstrate that declining steam quality at greater burial depths significantly reduces thermal efficiency, the oil–steam ratio (OSR), and overall recovery in conventional SAGD operations. To overcome these challenges, numerical simulations were conducted to evaluate the effect of hexane co-injection in ES-SAGD. A 3 vol% hexane concentration was found to improve oil recovery by 17.3%, increase the peak oil production rate by 36.5%, and raise the cumulative oil–steam ratio from 0.137 to 0.218 compared to conventional SAGD. Sensitivity analyses further revealed that optimal performance is achieved with cyclic injection during the horizontal expansion stage and chamber pressures maintained above 3 MPa. Field-scale forecasting based on five SAGD well pairs showed that the proposed ES-SAGD configuration could enhance the cumulative recovery factor from 28.7% to 63.3% over seven years. These findings clarify the fundamental constraints imposed by steam quality in deep reservoirs and provide practical strategies for optimizing solvent-assisted SAGD operations under such conditions.
1
3 vol% hexane increased peak oil production rate by 36.5% and raised cumulative oil–steam ratio from 0.137 to 0.218 versus conventional SAGD.
2
A modified theoretical model accounting for steam quality reduction was applied to evaluate SAGD performance in deep reservoirs.
3
Co-injecting 3 vol% hexane in ES-SAGD improved oil recovery by 17.3% compared to conventional SAGD.
4
Declining steam quality with increasing reservoir depth significantly reduces thermal efficiency, oil–steam ratio (OSR), and recovery in conventional SAGD.
5
Field-scale forecasts for five SAGD well pairs predict cumulative recovery factor improvement from 28.7% to 63.3% over seven years using the proposed ES-SAGD configuration.
6
Sensitivity analysis shows optimal ES-SAGD performance with cyclic injection during horizontal expansion and chamber pressures above 3 MPa.
7
The study identifies steam quality constraints as fundamental limitations in deep extra-heavy oil reservoirs and provides practical optimization strategies for solvent-assisted SAGD.

Expanding Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (ES-SAGD) operations in deep extra-heavy oil reservoirs (case study: Shu 1-38-32 block, Liaohe Basin)

Impact of reduced steam quality at greater burial depths and optimization strategies (hexane co-injection concentration, cyclic injection during horizontal expansion, chamber pressure >3 MPa) on thermal efficiency, oil–steam ratio, peak production rate, and cumulative recovery for ES-SAGD

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-07-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
4
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Qi Jiang
Hongyuan Wang
Zhongyuan Wang
Tengfei Ma
Siyuan Huang
Simin Yang
Ying Zhou
Lifan Yue
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%