The concept of “scientific revolutions” in the Geoecology knowledge system
Концепция «научных революций» в системе знаний геоэкологии
2020-01-01
SCID: 54.1/xbaumx46
Discuss with AI
Geoecologynoospheric thinkingscientific revolutionsstrategic territorial managementsustainable development of regions
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The current situation in the field of information support for solving the problem of sustainable development of regions, using the example and in the appendix to the “meta-knowledge” of Geoecology is examined in the paper. The purpose of the research is to develop “human-machine” systems for making optimal management decisions (strategic management of the processes of sustainable development of territories at the regional level). The object of research is active, including “conservative” and “dissipative”, complex organized systems of the class “nature-society”. The starting points of the methodology and management theory are the following concepts: the unified Field Theory (the end of the XX century), the theory new “scientific revolutions” (T. Kuhn, 1962), the “Concept of sustainable development” of regions (UN, 1993) and the “new theory of entropy” (A. N. Panchenkov, 1999). The leading scientific methods: “noosphere” theory (E. Le Roy and P. T. Chardin, 1927; Vernadsky V. I., 1933) and the approach of “geosystem” (F. Capra, 1991). The results of the research and their significance for the theory and practice of strategic management of territories at the global, regional and local levels of the planet’s organization lead to the conclusion that it is necessary to move from differentiation of all available knowledge about Nature and Society (“mechanistic” thinking; object-oriented approach) to their full integration (“noospheric” thinking; normative approach). In the future, this will allow us to begin practical implementation of the development of Russia and the world based on the strategy and Concept of “noocracy”.
Key Findings
1
It aims to develop human–machine systems for optimal management decisions concerning sustainable development processes in regions.
2
Its central theoretical claim is that sustainable territorial management requires integrating knowledge of Nature and Society rather than maintaining mechanistic, object-oriented differentiation.
3
The paper examines Geoecology’s “meta-knowledge” as information support for sustainable regional development and strategic territorial management.
4
The proposed transition toward noospheric, normative thinking is presented as a basis for future development of Russia and the world under a strategy of noocracy.
5
The research addresses active, complexly organized nature–society systems, including both conservative and dissipative systems.
Research Object
Active, complex organized nature–society systems, including conservative and dissipative systems, at regional territorial levels
Research Subject
Integration of knowledge and human–machine strategic management of sustainable territorial development, including the transition from mechanistic object-oriented thinking to noospheric normative thinking
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest