Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence
Дифференцированное обучение в среднем образовании: систематический обзор результатов исследований
2019-11-22
SCID: 54.1/xc9d3trm
Discuss with AI
ability groupingdifferentiated instructionsecondary educationstudent achievementsystematic review
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This paper provides an overview of theoretical conceptualizations of differentiated instruction and prior findings on its effects for student achievement. Furthermore, by means of a systematic review of the literature from 2006-2016, empirical evidence on the effects of within-class differentiated instruction on secondary school students’ academic achievement is evaluated. Although differentiated instruction has currently gained a lot attention in education, only eleven empirical studies on the topic were selected for review. A narrative description of the selected papers shows that differentiated instruction has been operationalized in many different ways. The selection includes studies on generic teacher trainings for differentiated instruction, ability grouping and tiering, individualization, mastery learning, heterogeneous grouping and remediation in flipped classroom lessons. The majority of the studies show small to moderate positive effects of differentiated instruction on student achievement which gives some indication of the possible benefits of differentiated instruction. However, more research is needed before drawing convincing conclusions regarding the effectiveness and value of different approaches to differentiated instruction for secondary school classes.
Key Findings
1
A systematic review identified only eleven empirical studies examining within-class differentiated instruction and secondary students’ academic achievement from 2006–2016.
2
Differentiated instruction was operationalized heterogeneously, including teacher training, ability grouping, tiering, individualization, mastery learning, heterogeneous grouping, and flipped-classroom remediation.
3
Most reviewed studies reported small to moderate positive effects of differentiated instruction on student achievement.
4
The evidence suggests potential benefits, but remains insufficient for convincing conclusions about the effectiveness and value of specific differentiated-instruction approaches in secondary classrooms.
Research Object
within-class differentiated instruction in secondary school classes
Research Subject
its effects on secondary students’ academic achievement and the effectiveness of different differentiated-instruction approaches
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-11-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest