Combustion of GAP/HMX and GAP/TAGN Energetic Composite Materials
Горение энергетических композиционных материалов GAP/HMX и GAP/TAGN
2000-04-01
SCID: 54.1/xcajk6rc
Discuss with AI
burning ratecyclotetramethylene tetranitramineenergetic composite materialsglycidyl azide polymertriaminoguanidine nitrate
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Energetic composite materials (ECM) have high thermodynamic potential and flexible design capability. Two types of ECM were formulated as mixtures of glycidyl azide polymer (GAP) and crystalline materials. The crystalline materials evaluated were cyclotetramethylene tetranitramine (HMX) and triaminoguanidine nitrate (TAGN). The thermochemical properties of HMX and TAGN were different to each other: HMX is a high energy material but the burning rate is lower than that of TAGN. TAGN produces hydrogen as a combustion product and the thermodynamic potential becomes high even though the flame temperature is low. The results of burning rate measurement tests indicate that the burning rates of both ECM are decreased significantly by the addition of HMX and TAGN even though the burning rates of GAP, HMX, and TAGN are higher than those of the ECM. The temperature sensitivity of burning rate of GAP is reduced significantly by the addition of HMX and remains unchanged by the addition of TAGN. The reduced burning rates of GAP/HMX and GAP/TAGN are caused by the reduced heat flux transferred back from the gas phase to the burning surface. The reduced heat release at the burning surface of GAP/HMX is responsible for the reduced temperature sensitivity.
Key Findings
1
Adding either HMX or TAGN significantly decreases the composite burning rate, despite GAP, HMX, and TAGN individually burning faster than the corresponding composites.
2
For GAP/HMX, reduced heat release at the burning surface accounts for the decreased burning-rate temperature sensitivity.
3
GAP/HMX and GAP/TAGN energetic composites combine GAP with crystalline HMX or TAGN, providing distinct thermochemical design options.
4
HMX addition significantly reduces GAP’s burning-rate temperature sensitivity, whereas TAGN addition leaves GAP’s temperature sensitivity essentially unchanged.
5
The reduced burning rates of both composites result from decreased heat flux transferred from the gas phase back to the burning surface.
Research Object
GAP/HMX and GAP/TAGN energetic composite materials during combustion
Research Subject
Burning-rate behavior, temperature sensitivity, heat-flux feedback, and surface heat release of the composites
Publication Details
Publication Date
2000-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest