Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

Снижение смертности от рака легкого при объемной компьютерно-томографической скрининговой программе: рандомизированное исследование
Matthijs Oudkerk, Johny Verschakelen, Harry J. de Koning, Carlijn M. van der Aalst, Pim A. de Jong, Ernst T. Scholten, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Marjolein A. Heuvelmans, Jan‐Willem J. Lammers, Carla Weenink, Uraujh Yousaf-Khan, Nanda Horeweg, Susan van ’t Westeinde, Mathias Prokop, Willem P.Th.M. Mali, Firdaus A. A. Mohamed Hoesein, Peter M. A. van Ooijen, Joachim G.J.V. Aerts, Michael A. den Bakker, Erik Thunnissen, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Joan Walter, Kevin ten Haaf, Harry J.M. Groen
2020-01-29

low-dose computed tomographylung-cancer mortalityrandomized trialsmokersvolume CT screening
BACKGROUND: There are limited data from randomized trials regarding whether volume-based, low-dose computed tomographic (CT) screening can reduce lung-cancer mortality among male former and current smokers. METHODS: A total of 13,195 men (primary analysis) and 2594 women (subgroup analyses) between the ages of 50 and 74 were randomly assigned to undergo CT screening at T0 (baseline), year 1, year 3, and year 5.5 or no screening. We obtained data on cancer diagnosis and the date and cause of death through linkages with national registries in the Netherlands and Belgium, and a review committee confirmed lung cancer as the cause of death when possible. A minimum follow-up of 10 years until December 31, 2015, was completed for all participants. RESULTS: Among men, the average adherence to CT screening was 90.0%. On average, 9.2% of the screened participants underwent at least one additional CT scan (initially indeterminate). The overall referral rate for suspicious nodules was 2.1%. At 10 years of follow-up, the incidence of lung cancer was 5.58 cases per 1000 person-years in the screening group and 4.91 cases per 1000 person-years in the control group; lung-cancer mortality was 2.50 deaths per 1000 person-years and 3.30 deaths per 1000 person-years, respectively. The cumulative rate ratio for death from lung cancer at 10 years was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.94; P = 0.01) in the screening group as compared with the control group, similar to the values at years 8 and 9. Among women, the rate ratio was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.38 to 1.14) at 10 years of follow-up, with values of 0.41 to 0.52 in years 7 through 9. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving high-risk persons, lung-cancer mortality was significantly lower among those who underwent volume CT screening than among those who underwent no screening. There were low rates of follow-up procedures for results suggestive of lung cancer. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization of Health Research and Development and others; NELSON Netherlands Trial Register number, NL580.).
1
Among women, screening showed a nonsignificant 10-year lung-cancer mortality rate ratio of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.38–1.14), with lower rate ratios of 0.41–0.52 during years 7–9.
2
CT-screening adherence among men averaged 90.0%, while only 2.1% were referred for suspicious nodules and 9.2% underwent additional CT for initially indeterminate findings.
3
In high-risk men aged 50–74, volume-based low-dose CT screening reduced 10-year lung-cancer mortality by 24% versus no screening (rate ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.94; P=0.01).
4
Lung-cancer mortality was 2.50 versus 3.30 deaths per 1000 person-years in the screening and control groups, respectively, despite higher lung-cancer incidence with screening.
5
The randomized trial found significantly reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening and low rates of follow-up procedures for suspicious findings.

High-risk male and female former and current smokers aged 50–74 undergoing volume-based low-dose CT screening

The effect of repeated volume CT screening on lung-cancer incidence and mortality, including screening adherence and follow-up for suspicious nodules

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-01-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Matthijs Oudkerk
Johny Verschakelen
Harry J. de Koning
Carlijn M. van der Aalst
Pim A. de Jong
Ernst T. Scholten
Kristiaan Nackaerts
Marjolein A. Heuvelmans
Jan‐Willem J. Lammers
Carla Weenink
Uraujh Yousaf-Khan
Nanda Horeweg
Susan van ’t Westeinde
Mathias Prokop
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
Firdaus A. A. Mohamed Hoesein
Peter M. A. van Ooijen
Joachim G.J.V. Aerts
Michael A. den Bakker
Erik Thunnissen
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Joan Walter
Kevin ten Haaf
Harry J.M. Groen
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%