Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Гефитиниб или карбоплатин–паклитаксел при аденокарциноме лёгкого
2009-08-19
SCID: 54.1/xmgkw5yn
Discuss with AI
Carboplatin-paclitaxelEGFR mutationsGefitinibProgression-free survivalPulmonary adenocarcinoma
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Previous, uncontrolled studies have suggested that first-line treatment with gefitinib would be efficacious in selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label study, we randomly assigned previously untreated patients in East Asia who had advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma and who were nonsmokers or former light smokers to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day) (609 patients) or carboplatin (at a dose calculated to produce an area under the curve of 5 or 6 mg per milliliter per minute) plus paclitaxel (200 mg per square meter of body-surface area) (608 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The 12-month rates of progression-free survival were 24.9% with gefitinib and 6.7% with carboplatin-paclitaxel. The study met its primary objective of showing the noninferiority of gefitinib and also showed its superiority, as compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel, with respect to progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001). In the subgroup of 261 patients who were positive for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received gefitinib than among those who received carboplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.64; P<0.001), whereas in the subgroup of 176 patients who were negative for the mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received carboplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death with gefitinib, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.05 to 3.98; P<0.001). The most common adverse events were rash or acne (in 66.2% of patients) and diarrhea (46.6%) in the gefitinib group and neurotoxic effects (69.9%), neutropenia (67.1%), and alopecia (58.4%) in the carboplatin-paclitaxel group. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib is superior to carboplatin-paclitaxel as an initial treatment for pulmonary adenocarcinoma among nonsmokers or former light smokers in East Asia. The presence in the tumor of a mutation of the EGFR gene is a strong predictor of a better outcome with gefitinib. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00322452.)
Key Findings
1
Adverse-event profiles differed: gefitinib commonly caused rash or acne and diarrhea, whereas chemotherapy commonly caused neurotoxic effects, neutropenia, and alopecia.
2
Among EGFR mutation-negative patients, carboplatin–paclitaxel significantly improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio for gefitinib, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.05–3.98; P<0.001).
3
Among patients with EGFR mutations, gefitinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with carboplatin–paclitaxel (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36–0.64; P<0.001).
4
In previously untreated East Asian nonsmokers or former light smokers with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma, gefitinib was superior to carboplatin–paclitaxel for progression-free survival.
5
The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 24.9% with gefitinib versus 6.7% with carboplatin–paclitaxel; hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65–0.85; P<0.001).
Research Object
Previously untreated East Asian nonsmoking or former light-smoking patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma
Research Subject
Progression-free survival and treatment-related efficacy of first-line gefitinib versus carboplatin–paclitaxel, including differences by EGFR mutation status
Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-08-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest