Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis.
Эффекты программ по управлению профессиональным стрессом: метаанализ
2008-01-01
SCID: 54.1/xms8v4b9
Discuss with AI
Cohen's dcognitive-behavioral programsmeta-analysisoccupational stress managementstress management interventions
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of stress management interventions in occupational settings. Thirty-six experimental studies were included, representing 55 interventions. Total sample size was 2,847. Of the participants, 59% were female, mean age was 35.4, and average length of intervention was 7.4 weeks. The overall weighted effect size (Cohen's d) for all studies was 0.526 (95% confidence interval = 0.364, 0.687), a significant medium to large effect. Interventions were coded as cognitive-behavioral, relaxation, organizational, multimodal, or alternative. Analyses based on these subgroups suggested that intervention type played a moderating role. Cognitive-behavioral programs consistently produced larger effects than other types of interventions, but if additional treatment components were added the effect was reduced. Within the sample of studies, relaxation interventions were most frequently used, and organizational interventions continued to be scarce. Effects were based mainly on psychological outcome variables, as opposed to physiological or organizational measures. The examination of additional moderators such as treatment length, outcome variable, and occupation did not reveal significant variations in effect size by intervention type.
Key Findings
1
Adding additional treatment components to cognitive-behavioral programs reduced their effect size.
2
Cognitive-behavioral programs consistently produced larger effects than other intervention types.
3
Effects were primarily observed on psychological outcome variables rather than physiological or organizational measures.
4
Interventions were categorized as cognitive-behavioral, relaxation, organizational, multimodal, or alternative; intervention type moderated effectiveness.
5
Meta-analysis of 36 experimental studies (55 interventions, N=2,847) found an overall weighted effect size d=0.526 (95% CI 0.364–0.687), a significant medium-to-large effect of occupational stress management interventions.
6
Relaxation interventions were the most frequently used; organizational interventions were scarce.
7
Treatment length, outcome variable, and occupation did not significantly modify effect sizes by intervention type.
Research Object
Stress management intervention programs in occupational settings
Research Subject
Effectiveness (impact on psychological, physiological, and organizational outcomes) and moderating effects of intervention type, treatment length, outcome variable, and occupation on intervention effect sizes
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest