Fighting to Train—Implementation of a Train Like You Fight Joint Role 2 Austere Surgical Care Curriculum
Борьба за подготовку — внедрение объединённой учебной программы по оказанию хирургической помощи в austere-условиях на уровне Role 2 по принципу «тренируйся так, как будешь действовать»
2025-11-10
SCID: 54.1/xn7dh8rr
Discuss with AI
Joint Role 2 curriculumaustere resuscitative and surgical caremilitary surgical team trainingprolonged holdingsimulated tactical exposure
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
INTRODUCTION: Each military service has independently developed austere resuscitative and surgical care (ARSC) team training courses that vary in use, content, duration, tactical exposure, and clinical emphasis. A 2020 Department of Defense Inspector General audit identified training deficits for ARSC teams. To close this gap, we developed ARSC curriculum standards for the Joint Force. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A work group of Tri-Service appointed multidisciplinary subject matter experts (SMEs) reviewed available Role 2 and ARSC training courses to identify common curricular elements, best practices, and training gaps. Through an iterative process, these findings were incorporated into a standard curriculum organized into modules subdivided into terminal learning objectives (TLOs) and enabling learning objectives (ELOs), which were validated against Service doctrinal ARSC capability requirements. RESULTS: Curricula from 12 different courses were identified and reviewed. Most prepared teams for Counter Insurgency operations characterized by short holding times and rapid aeromedical evacuation. Eighty-two clinical and nonclinical common curricular best practices were identified. Only four courses had 50% or more of SME-recommended curricular elements. Identified curricular gaps included prolonged holding (0% of courses), definitive austere surgical care (0%), austere critical care (25%), simulated tactical exposure (25%), night operations familiarization (37.5%), and simulated operational environment (62.5%). Ten modules were created comprised of 20 TLOs and 259 ELOs incorporating curricular best practices and identified gaps. CONCLUSION: Military medicine is preparing surgical teams for the war just fought, not the future fight and lacks a joint standard for training Role 2/ARSC surgical teams, which is a risk to force and to mission. We close this gap by creating the first Joint Role 2 forward surgical/ARSC curriculum.
Key Findings
1
A Tri-Service expert work group reviewed 12 Role 2 and austere resuscitative and surgical care training courses to identify shared standards and gaps.
2
A joint curriculum was created with 10 modules, 20 terminal learning objectives, and 259 enabling learning objectives, establishing the first Joint Role 2 forward surgical and ARSC training standard.
3
Major gaps included prolonged holding and definitive austere surgical care in all courses, with limited austere critical care, tactical exposure, night operations, and simulated operational environments.
4
Most existing courses focused on counterinsurgency operations with short holding times and rapid aeromedical evacuation rather than future high-intensity operational demands.
5
The review identified 82 common clinical and nonclinical best practices, but only four courses included at least 50% of SME-recommended curricular elements.
Research Object
Joint Role 2 austere resuscitative and surgical care (ARSC) team training curriculum
Research Subject
Curricular standards, best practices, and training gaps for preparing ARSC teams for future operational conditions
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-11-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest