Fighting to Train—Implementation of a Train Like You Fight Joint Role 2 Austere Surgical Care Curriculum

Борьба за подготовку — внедрение объединённой учебной программы по оказанию хирургической помощи в austere-условиях на уровне Role 2 по принципу «тренируйся так, как будешь действовать»
Matthew D. Tadlock, Dan S. Mosely, Jay B Baker, Sean F. Keenan, Ronald D. Hardin, T Becker, Richard A Jarret, Jennifer M. Gurney
2025-11-10

Joint Role 2 curriculumaustere resuscitative and surgical caremilitary surgical team trainingprolonged holdingsimulated tactical exposure
INTRODUCTION: Each military service has independently developed austere resuscitative and surgical care (ARSC) team training courses that vary in use, content, duration, tactical exposure, and clinical emphasis. A 2020 Department of Defense Inspector General audit identified training deficits for ARSC teams. To close this gap, we developed ARSC curriculum standards for the Joint Force. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A work group of Tri-Service appointed multidisciplinary subject matter experts (SMEs) reviewed available Role 2 and ARSC training courses to identify common curricular elements, best practices, and training gaps. Through an iterative process, these findings were incorporated into a standard curriculum organized into modules subdivided into terminal learning objectives (TLOs) and enabling learning objectives (ELOs), which were validated against Service doctrinal ARSC capability requirements. RESULTS: Curricula from 12 different courses were identified and reviewed. Most prepared teams for Counter Insurgency operations characterized by short holding times and rapid aeromedical evacuation. Eighty-two clinical and nonclinical common curricular best practices were identified. Only four courses had 50% or more of SME-recommended curricular elements. Identified curricular gaps included prolonged holding (0% of courses), definitive austere surgical care (0%), austere critical care (25%), simulated tactical exposure (25%), night operations familiarization (37.5%), and simulated operational environment (62.5%). Ten modules were created comprised of 20 TLOs and 259 ELOs incorporating curricular best practices and identified gaps. CONCLUSION: Military medicine is preparing surgical teams for the war just fought, not the future fight and lacks a joint standard for training Role 2/ARSC surgical teams, which is a risk to force and to mission. We close this gap by creating the first Joint Role 2 forward surgical/ARSC curriculum.
1
A Tri-Service expert work group reviewed 12 Role 2 and austere resuscitative and surgical care training courses to identify shared standards and gaps.
2
A joint curriculum was created with 10 modules, 20 terminal learning objectives, and 259 enabling learning objectives, establishing the first Joint Role 2 forward surgical and ARSC training standard.
3
Major gaps included prolonged holding and definitive austere surgical care in all courses, with limited austere critical care, tactical exposure, night operations, and simulated operational environments.
4
Most existing courses focused on counterinsurgency operations with short holding times and rapid aeromedical evacuation rather than future high-intensity operational demands.
5
The review identified 82 common clinical and nonclinical best practices, but only four courses included at least 50% of SME-recommended curricular elements.

Joint Role 2 austere resuscitative and surgical care (ARSC) team training curriculum

Curricular standards, best practices, and training gaps for preparing ARSC teams for future operational conditions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-11-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Matthew D. Tadlock
Dan S. Mosely
Jay B Baker
Sean F. Keenan
Ronald D. Hardin
T Becker
Richard A Jarret
Jennifer M. Gurney
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%