Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Severe Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

Стимуляция субталамического ядра при тяжелом обсессивно-компульсивном расстройстве
Yves Agid, Marie‐Odile Krebs, Denys Fontaine, Paul Krack, Sophie Tézenas du Montcel, Pierre Pollak, Virginie Czernecki, Stéphan Chabardès, Alim‐Louis Benabid, Nématollah Jaafari, Bertrand Devaux, Philippe Damier, Thierry Bougerol, Bruno Aouizerate, Mircea Polosan, Pierre Burbaud, Philippe Cornu, Jérôme Yelnik, Éric Bardinet, Didier Dormont, Bruno Millet, Luc Mallet, Marc Vérin, Marie‐Laure Welter, Claire Ardouin, Antoine Pélissolo, Nicolas Baup, Isabelle Chéreau, Christophe Arbus, Sylvie Raoul, Patrick Chaynes, Philippe Derost, B. Bataille, Vianney Mattei, Jean‐Luc Houéto
2008-11-12

Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scalecrossover double-blind trialdeep brain stimulationobsessive-compulsive disordersubthalamic nucleus stimulation
BACKGROUND: Severe, refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling condition. Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, a procedure that is already validated for the treatment of movement disorders, has been proposed as a therapeutic option. METHODS: In this 10-month, crossover, double-blind, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, we randomly assigned eight patients with highly refractory OCD to undergo active stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus followed by sham stimulation and eight to undergo sham stimulation followed by active stimulation. The primary outcome measure was the severity of OCD, as assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), at the end of two 3-month periods. General psychopathologic findings, functioning, and tolerance were assessed with the use of standardized psychiatric scales, the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, and neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: After active stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, the Y-BOCS score (on a scale from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating less severe symptoms) was significantly lower than the score after sham stimulation (mean [+/-SD], 19+/-8 vs. 28+/-7; P=0.01), and the GAF score (on a scale from 1 to 90, with higher scores indicating higher levels of functioning) was significantly higher (56+/-14 vs. 43+/-8, P=0.005). The ratings of neuropsychological measures, depression, and anxiety were not modified by stimulation. There were 15 serious adverse events overall, including 1 intracerebral hemorrhage and 2 infections; there were also 23 nonserious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus may reduce the symptoms of severe forms of OCD but is associated with a substantial risk of serious adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00169377.)
1
Global functioning significantly improved with active stimulation compared with sham stimulation (GAF 56±14 vs. 43±8; P=0.005).
2
In a 16-patient randomized, double-blind, multicenter crossover study, active subthalamic nucleus stimulation reduced OCD severity versus sham stimulation.
3
Mean Y-BOCS scores were significantly lower with active stimulation than sham stimulation (19±8 vs. 28±7; P=0.01).
4
Stimulation did not modify neuropsychological performance, depression, or anxiety ratings.
5
The intervention carried substantial safety risks, including 15 serious adverse events, one intracerebral hemorrhage, and two infections.

severe, highly refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder treated with subthalamic nucleus stimulation

the efficacy, functional effects, neuropsychological effects, and safety of subthalamic nucleus stimulation

Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-11-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yves Agid
Marie‐Odile Krebs
Denys Fontaine
Paul Krack
Sophie Tézenas du Montcel
Pierre Pollak
Virginie Czernecki
Stéphan Chabardès
Alim‐Louis Benabid
Nématollah Jaafari
Bertrand Devaux
Philippe Damier
Thierry Bougerol
Bruno Aouizerate
Mircea Polosan
Pierre Burbaud
Philippe Cornu
Jérôme Yelnik
Éric Bardinet
Didier Dormont
Bruno Millet
Luc Mallet
Marc Vérin
Marie‐Laure Welter
Claire Ardouin
Antoine Pélissolo
Nicolas Baup
Isabelle Chéreau
Christophe Arbus
Sylvie Raoul
Patrick Chaynes
Philippe Derost
B. Bataille
Vianney Mattei
Jean‐Luc Houéto
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%