Partially Overlapping Neural Correlates of Metacognitive Monitoring and Metacognitive Control
Частично перекрывающиеся нейронные корреляты метакогнитивного мониторинга и метакогнитивного контроля
2022-03-18
SCID: 54.1/xwefypd9
Discuss with AI
cognitive offloadingfunctional MRImetacognitive controlmetacognitive monitoringmultivariate pattern analysis
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Metacognition describes the process of monitoring one's own mental states, often for the purpose of cognitive control. Previous research has investigated how metacognitive signals are generated (metacognitive monitoring), for example, when people (both female/male) judge their confidence in their decisions and memories. Research has also investigated how metacognitive signals are used to influence behavior (metacognitive control), for example, setting a reminder (i.e., cognitive offloading) for something you are not confident you will remember. However, the mapping between metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control needs further study on a neural level. We used fMRI to investigate a delayed-intentions task with a reminder element, allowing human participants to use their metacognitive insight to engage metacognitive control. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we found that we could separately decode both monitoring and control, and, to a lesser extent, cross-classify between them. Therefore, brain patterns associated with monitoring and control are partially, but not fully, overlapping. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Models of metacognition commonly distinguish between monitoring (how metacognition is formed) and control (how metacognition is used for behavioral regulation). Research into these facets of metacognition has often happened in isolation. Here, we provide a study which directly investigates the mapping between metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control at a neural level. We applied multivariate pattern analysis to fMRI data from a novel task in which participants separately rated their confidence (metacognitive monitoring) and how much they would like to use a reminder (metacognitive control). We find support for the notion that the two aspects of metacognition overlap partially but not fully. We argue that future research should focus on how different metacognitive signals are selected for control.
Key Findings
1
An fMRI delayed-intentions task with reminders separately measured metacognitive confidence monitoring and reminder-based control.
2
Multivariate pattern analysis independently decoded neural patterns associated with metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control.
3
Neural patterns for monitoring and control cross-classified to a lesser extent, indicating partial but not complete overlap.
4
The findings support distinguishing metacognitive monitoring from control while suggesting that future research should examine how signals are selected for behavioral regulation.
Research Object
Human metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control during a delayed-intentions task with a reminder element
Research Subject
The neural correspondence and degree of overlap between metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-03-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
39
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest