Prevalence and influencing factors of nonunion in patients with tibial fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis
Распространённость и факторы, влияющие на развитие несращения у пациентов с переломами большеберцовой кости: систематический обзор и метаанализ
2020-09-03
SCID: 54.1/y7a5jcb7
Discuss with AI
influencing factorsminimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesispooled prevalencesystematic review and meta-analysistibial fracture nonunion
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of nonunion in patients with tibia fracture and the association between influencing factors and tibia fracture nonunion. METHOD: A database searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu database, and Wanfang database from inception until June 2019 was conducted. The pooled prevalence, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with Stata software. RESULTS: In this study, 111 studies involving 41,429 subjects were included. In the study of the relationship between influencing factors and tibia fracture nonunion, 15 factors significantly influenced the fracture union, including > 60 years old, male, tobacco smoker, body mass index > 40, diabetes, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) user, opioids user, fracture of middle and distal tibia, high-energy fracture, open fracture, Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB or IIIC, Müller AO Classification of Fractures C, open reduction, fixation model, and infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of nonunion in patients with tibia fracture was 0.068 and 15 potential factors were associated with the prevalence. Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) have the low risks of nonunion for the treatment of tibial fractures.
Key Findings
1
A systematic review and meta-analysis included 111 studies involving 41,429 patients with tibial fractures.
2
Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis were associated with lower nonunion risk in tibial fracture treatment.
3
Fifteen factors were significantly associated with tibial fracture nonunion, including older age, male sex, smoking, severe obesity, diabetes, NSAID or opioid use, fracture characteristics, open injury, reduction method, fixation, and infection.
4
Higher-risk fracture features included middle or distal tibial location, high-energy trauma, open fractures, Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB/IIIC, and Müller AO type C classification.
5
The pooled prevalence of nonunion after tibial fracture was 0.068.
Research Object
tibial fractures in patients
Research Subject
the prevalence of fracture nonunion and its associations with demographic, clinical, fracture-related, treatment-related, and infection factors
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-09-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest