The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

White Paper CosmoVerse: решение наблюдательных противоречий в космологии с учётом систематик и фундаментальной физики
Francesco Bajardi, Salvatore Capozzıello, Andrew R. Liddle, A. Palmese, Alexander G. Reeves, Sunny Vagnozzi, A. Melchiorri, Will Handley, Eleonora Di Valentino, Luis A. Anchordoqui, Özgür Akarsu, Marika Asgari, Micol Benetti, Jens Chluba, Eoin Ó Colgáin, Adrià Gómez-Valent, Alan Heavens, Florian Niedermann, Rafael C. Nunes, Andronikos Paliathanasis, Supriya Pan, Vivian Poulin, Adam G. Riess, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, Anjan A. Sen, Anowar J. Shajib, Carsten van de Bruck, Luca Visinelli, William Giarè, Florian Beutler, András Kovács, Amanda Weltman, Richard I. Anderson, D. Eckert, Maria Giovanna Dainotti, Michele Cantiello, Gabriela Barenboim, Anne-Christine Davis, Jackson Levi Said, A. Bonanno, Cheng‐Yu Kuo, Tommaso Treu, M. Gerbino, István Szapudi, Khaled Said, M. Vincenzi, Alexander Bonilla, A. Amon, L. Galbany, A. Kogut, Leandros Perivolaropoulos, Indranil Banik, Vid Iršič, Agnieszka Pollo, Vivian Poulin, Caroline D. Huang, Chandra Shekhar Saraf, Cora Uhlemann, Daniela Grandón, Dante J. Paz, Elsa M. Teixeira, Giulia Gubitosi, I. Musella, J. Singal, Jaume de Haro, Jesús Torrado, Jurgen Mifsud, Karsten Jedamzik, Konstantinos F. Dialektopoulos, Laura Herold, Lei Zu, Louise Breuval, Luis A. Escamilla, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, M Lembo, Matteo Forconi, M. Moresco, Nils Schöneberg, Reginald Christian Bernardo, Ricardo Chávez, Richard Watkins, Siyang Li, Yukei S. Murakami, Abdolali Banihashemi, Adèle Poudou, Alba Domi, Aleksander Łukasz Lenart, Alessandro Vadalà, Alexander Zhuk, Ali Övgün, Alice Pisani, Alireza Talebian, Amare Abebe, Amin Aboubrahim, Ana Luisa González Morán, Andreas Lymperis, Andreas Papatriantafyllou, A. Borowiec, Anil K. Yadav, Anita Yadav, Anjitha John William, Alexander Bonilla Rivera
2025-06-20

Hubble tensioncosmological tensionsearly- and late-Universe probesnovel data analysis methodssystematics in cosmological probes
The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-time inflationary physics, and underpinned by gravitation through general relativity. There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model. However, recent years have shown that there may also be questions from the observational sector with the emergence of differences between certain cosmological probes. In this White Paper, we identify the key objectives that need to be addressed over the coming decade together with the core science projects that aim to meet these challenges. These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys. We also discuss the growing set of novel data analysis approaches that go beyond traditional methods to test physical models. These new methods will become increasingly important in the coming years as the volume of survey data continues to increase, and as the degeneracy between predictions of different physical models grows. There are several perspectives on the divergences between the values of cosmological parameters, such as the model-independent probes in the late Universe and model-dependent measurements in the early Universe, which we cover at length. The White Paper closes with a number of recommendations for the community to focus on for the upcoming decade of observational cosmology, statistical data analysis, and fundamental physics developments. Download: Download high-res image (270KB) Download: Download full-size image
1
An array of promising beyond-standard-model physical scenarios could be observable in upcoming surveys and should be a focus for investigation.
2
Current standard cosmological model (ΛCDM + inflation + GR) fits many observations but faces emerging observational tensions between different probes.
3
Divergences in core cosmological parameter measurements exist with varying statistical confidence and may reflect systematics or new physics beyond the standard model.
4
Novel data analysis approaches that go beyond traditional methods are needed to distinguish degenerate model predictions as survey data volumes grow.
5
Systematics in measurements and probes are identified as partial possible explanations, motivating detailed review and mitigation across principal cosmological probes.

Cosmological observations and surveys used to measure core cosmological parameters

Discrepancies/tensions in measured cosmological parameters and their origins, including observational systematics and potential new fundamental physics, plus methods to diagnose and resolve them

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-06-20
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
300
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Francesco Bajardi
Salvatore Capozzıello
Andrew R. Liddle
A. Palmese
Alexander G. Reeves
Sunny Vagnozzi
A. Melchiorri
Will Handley
Eleonora Di Valentino
Luis A. Anchordoqui
Özgür Akarsu
Marika Asgari
Micol Benetti
Jens Chluba
Eoin Ó Colgáin
Adrià Gómez-Valent
Alan Heavens
Florian Niedermann
Rafael C. Nunes
Andronikos Paliathanasis
Supriya Pan
Vivian Poulin
Adam G. Riess
Emmanuel N. Saridakis
Anjan A. Sen
Anowar J. Shajib
Carsten van de Bruck
Luca Visinelli
William Giarè
Florian Beutler
András Kovács
Amanda Weltman
Richard I. Anderson
D. Eckert
Maria Giovanna Dainotti
Michele Cantiello
Gabriela Barenboim
Anne-Christine Davis
Jackson Levi Said
A. Bonanno
Cheng‐Yu Kuo
Tommaso Treu
M. Gerbino
István Szapudi
Khaled Said
M. Vincenzi
Alexander Bonilla
A. Amon
L. Galbany
A. Kogut
Leandros Perivolaropoulos
Indranil Banik
Vid Iršič
Agnieszka Pollo
Vivian Poulin
Caroline D. Huang
Chandra Shekhar Saraf
Cora Uhlemann
Daniela Grandón
Dante J. Paz
Elsa M. Teixeira
Giulia Gubitosi
I. Musella
J. Singal
Jaume de Haro
Jesús Torrado
Jurgen Mifsud
Karsten Jedamzik
Konstantinos F. Dialektopoulos
Laura Herold
Lei Zu
Louise Breuval
Luis A. Escamilla
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
M Lembo
Matteo Forconi
M. Moresco
Nils Schöneberg
Reginald Christian Bernardo
Ricardo Chávez
Richard Watkins
Siyang Li
Yukei S. Murakami
Abdolali Banihashemi
Adèle Poudou
Alba Domi
Aleksander Łukasz Lenart
Alessandro Vadalà
Alexander Zhuk
Ali Övgün
Alice Pisani
Alireza Talebian
Amare Abebe
Amin Aboubrahim
Ana Luisa González Morán
Andreas Lymperis
Andreas Papatriantafyllou
A. Borowiec
Anil K. Yadav
Anita Yadav
Anjitha John William
Alexander Bonilla Rivera
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%