RuWritingStyles: Russian Claude custom styles and an agentic review pipeline for scholarly writing on Sanskrit linguistics
RuWritingStyles: русские пользовательские стили Claude и агентный конвейер рецензирования научных текстов по санскритской лингвистике
2026-07-19
SCID: 54.1/y9vd6hs4
Discuss with AI
Claude custom stylesIAST/Cyrillic transliterationRussian scholarly writingSanskrit linguisticsagentic review pipeline
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
RuWritingStyles is a bilingual resource for scholarly writing on Sanskrit linguistics in Russian. It combines (1) a catalogue of Russian-language Claude custom-style prompts modelled on the prose method of major philologists (Zaliznyak, Tronsky, Mel'čuk, Elizarenkova, Toporov, Lidova and others), and (2) a zero-runtime-dependency agentic review pipeline that runs a multi-style "Council" over a Markdown manuscript (segment, independent style reviews, council deliberation, revision, verification) with deterministic Sanskrit quality checks: IAST/Cyrillic transliteration consistency, GOST R 7.0.100-2018 bibliography formatting, and citation grounding. Review panels are selectable by named council (general / sanskrit / indology). Quality is measured, not assumed: an N-averaged gold-case benchmark (5 Sanskrit gold cases × N=5 runs) shows detection of planted philological errors at 24/25 = 0.96; engine-side span-patch reconstruction with a document-growth budget raised the end-to-end pass rate from 0.48 to 0.92 with zero diff failures. The gold set carries a disclosed two-rater annotation (mechanical scorer vs an independent frontier model, agreement 24/25); the methodology paper draft, the benchmark protocol and all run artifacts are included for reproducibility.
Key Findings
1
Deterministic checks target IAST/Cyrillic transliteration consistency, GOST R 7.0.100-2018 bibliography formatting, and citation grounding.
2
Engine-side span-patch reconstruction increased the end-to-end pass rate from 0.48 to 0.92 with zero diff failures, supported by reproducible artifacts and disclosed two-rater agreement of 24/25.
3
On five Sanskrit gold cases across five runs, the system detected planted philological errors in 24 of 25 cases, achieving 0.96 detection accuracy.
4
RuWritingStyles provides a bilingual Russian scholarly-writing resource combining Claude style prompts modeled on major Sanskrit and philological scholars.
5
The agentic review pipeline applies independent style reviews, council deliberation, revision, and verification to Markdown manuscripts without runtime dependencies.
Research Object
RuWritingStyles: the bilingual resource and agentic review pipeline for Russian scholarly writing on Sanskrit linguistics
Research Subject
Its multi-style scholarly review, revision, verification, and deterministic Sanskrit-quality checking performance
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-07-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest