Pathway decisions for reuse and recycling of retired lithium-ion batteries considering economic and environmental functions

Выбор маршрутов повторного использования и переработки выбывших литий-ионных аккумуляторов с учетом экономических и экологических функций
Ruifei Ma, Shengyu Tao, Xin Sun, Yifang Ren, Chongbo Sun, Guanjun Ji, Jiahe Xu, Xuecen Wang, Xuan Zhang, Qiuwei Wu, Guangmin Zhou
2024-09-02

battery recyclingbattery reusehydrometallurgical recyclinglife cycle assessmentretired EV batteries
Reuse and recycling of retired electric vehicle (EV) batteries offer a sustainable waste management approach but face decision-making challenges. Based on the process-based life cycle assessment method, we present a strategy to optimize pathways of retired battery treatments economically and environmentally. The strategy is applied to various reuse scenarios with capacity configurations, including energy storage systems, communication base stations, and low-speed vehicles. Hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and direct recycling considering battery residual values are evaluated at the end-of-life stage. For the optimized pathway, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries improve profits by 58% and reduce emissions by 18% compared to hydrometallurgical recycling without reuse. Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) batteries boost profit by 19% and reduce emissions by 18%. Despite NMC batteries exhibiting higher immediate recycling returns, LFP batteries provide superior long-term benefits through reuse before recycling. Our strategy features an accessible evaluation framework for pinpointing optimal pathways of retired EV batteries. Reuse and recycling of retired electric vehicle batteries offer sustainable waste management but face decision challenges. Ma et al. present a strategy with an accessible economic and environmental evaluation framework for treating these batteries.
1
Compared with hydrometallurgical recycling without reuse, optimized pathways increase profits by 58% and reduce emissions by 18% for LFP batteries.
2
For NMC batteries, optimized pathways increase profits by 19% and reduce emissions by 18%; despite higher immediate recycling returns, LFP batteries yield greater long-term benefits through reuse before recycling.
3
It compares hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and direct recycling while accounting for residual battery values at end of life.
4
The framework evaluates reuse in energy storage systems, communication base stations, and low-speed vehicles with different capacity configurations.
5
The study develops a process-based life-cycle assessment strategy to optimize retired EV-battery treatment pathways across economic and environmental objectives.

retired electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries, including LFP and NMC chemistries

economic and environmental optimization of their reuse and end-of-life recycling pathways across different reuse scenarios and recycling processes

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-09-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
231
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ruifei Ma
Shengyu Tao
Xin Sun
Yifang Ren
Chongbo Sun
Guanjun Ji
Jiahe Xu
Xuecen Wang
Xuan Zhang
Qiuwei Wu
Guangmin Zhou
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%