Pathway decisions for reuse and recycling of retired lithium-ion batteries considering economic and environmental functions
Выбор маршрутов повторного использования и переработки выбывших литий-ионных аккумуляторов с учетом экономических и экологических функций
2024-09-02
SCID: 54.1/yagx6vpj
Discuss with AI
battery recyclingbattery reusehydrometallurgical recyclinglife cycle assessmentretired EV batteries
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Reuse and recycling of retired electric vehicle (EV) batteries offer a sustainable waste management approach but face decision-making challenges. Based on the process-based life cycle assessment method, we present a strategy to optimize pathways of retired battery treatments economically and environmentally. The strategy is applied to various reuse scenarios with capacity configurations, including energy storage systems, communication base stations, and low-speed vehicles. Hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and direct recycling considering battery residual values are evaluated at the end-of-life stage. For the optimized pathway, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries improve profits by 58% and reduce emissions by 18% compared to hydrometallurgical recycling without reuse. Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) batteries boost profit by 19% and reduce emissions by 18%. Despite NMC batteries exhibiting higher immediate recycling returns, LFP batteries provide superior long-term benefits through reuse before recycling. Our strategy features an accessible evaluation framework for pinpointing optimal pathways of retired EV batteries. Reuse and recycling of retired electric vehicle batteries offer sustainable waste management but face decision challenges. Ma et al. present a strategy with an accessible economic and environmental evaluation framework for treating these batteries.
Key Findings
1
Compared with hydrometallurgical recycling without reuse, optimized pathways increase profits by 58% and reduce emissions by 18% for LFP batteries.
2
For NMC batteries, optimized pathways increase profits by 19% and reduce emissions by 18%; despite higher immediate recycling returns, LFP batteries yield greater long-term benefits through reuse before recycling.
3
It compares hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and direct recycling while accounting for residual battery values at end of life.
4
The framework evaluates reuse in energy storage systems, communication base stations, and low-speed vehicles with different capacity configurations.
5
The study develops a process-based life-cycle assessment strategy to optimize retired EV-battery treatment pathways across economic and environmental objectives.
Research Object
retired electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries, including LFP and NMC chemistries
Research Subject
economic and environmental optimization of their reuse and end-of-life recycling pathways across different reuse scenarios and recycling processes
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-09-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
231
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest