Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics

Оценка плотности популяций животных с использованием пассивной акустики
Peter L. Tyack, Tiago A. Marques, Len Thomas, Stephen W. Martin, David K. Mellinger, Jessica Ward, David Moretti, Danielle Harris
2012-11-29

animal population density estimationdistance samplinghydrophone surveyspassive acoustic monitoringspatially explicit capture-recapture
Reliable estimation of the size or density of wild animal populations is very important for effective wildlife management, conservation and ecology. Currently, the most widely used methods for obtaining such estimates involve either sighting animals from transect lines or some form of capture-recapture on marked or uniquely identifiable individuals. However, many species are difficult to sight, and cannot be easily marked or recaptured. Some of these species produce readily identifiable sounds, providing an opportunity to use passive acoustic data to estimate animal density. In addition, even for species for which other visually based methods are feasible, passive acoustic methods offer the potential for greater detection ranges in some environments (e.g. underwater or in dense forest), and hence potentially better precision. Automated data collection means that surveys can take place at times and in places where it would be too expensive or dangerous to send human observers. Here, we present an overview of animal density estimation using passive acoustic data, a relatively new and fast-developing field. We review the types of data and methodological approaches currently available to researchers and we provide a framework for acoustics-based density estimation, illustrated with examples from real-world case studies. We mention moving sensor platforms (e.g. towed acoustics), but then focus on methods involving sensors at fixed locations, particularly hydrophones to survey marine mammals, as acoustic-based density estimation research to date has been concentrated in this area. Primary among these are methods based on distance sampling and spatially explicit capture-recapture. The methods are also applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial sound-producing taxa. We conclude that, despite being in its infancy, density estimation based on passive acoustic data likely will become an important method for surveying a number of diverse taxa, such as sea mammals, fish, birds, amphibians, and insects, especially in situations where inferences are required over long periods of time. There is considerable work ahead, with several potentially fruitful research areas, including the development of (i) hardware and software for data acquisition, (ii) efficient, calibrated, automated detection and classification systems, and (iii) statistical approaches optimized for this application. Further, survey design will need to be developed, and research is needed on the acoustic behaviour of target species. Fundamental research on vocalization rates and group sizes, and the relation between these and other factors such as season or behaviour state, is critical. Evaluation of the methods under known density scenarios will be important for empirically validating the approaches presented here.
1
Acoustic surveys can provide greater detection ranges than visual methods in environments such as underwater habitats and dense forests, potentially improving precision.
2
Although still in its infancy, passive-acoustic density estimation is expected to become an important survey method for diverse animal taxa.
3
Automated passive acoustic data collection enables surveys in locations and periods where deploying human observers would be costly or dangerous.
4
Distance sampling and spatially explicit capture-recapture are the primary approaches emphasized, especially for fixed hydrophone surveys of marine mammals, with applicability to other aquatic and terrestrial sound-producing taxa.
5
Passive acoustic monitoring offers a method for estimating animal population density when species are difficult to sight, mark, or recapture.
6
The review provides a framework covering available acoustic data types and density-estimation approaches, illustrated by real-world case studies.

Wild animal populations surveyed using passive acoustic sensors (e.g., hydrophones and fixed-location acoustic recorders)

Population density estimation from passive acoustic data, including distance sampling and spatially explicit capture-recapture approaches

Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-11-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Peter L. Tyack
Tiago A. Marques
Len Thomas
Stephen W. Martin
David K. Mellinger
Jessica Ward
David Moretti
Danielle Harris
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%