Prophylactic funnel mesh to prevent parastomal hernia in permanent end colostomy: A retrospective cohort study

Профилактическая воронкообразная сетка для предотвращения парастомальной грыжи при формировании постоянной концевой колостомы: ретроспективное когортное исследование
Yanic Ammann, Bernhard Widmann, Moritz Sparn, René Warschkow, Michael Weitzendorfer, Walter Brunner
2021-07-15

abdominoperineal rectum resectionparastomal herniapermanent end colostomypropensity score-adjusted analysisprophylactic funnel mesh
AIM: This study assessed the impact of a prophylactic, 3D funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh on the rate of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal rectum resection with permanent end colostomy. METHODS: Data from 76 patients receiving permanent end colostomy after abdominoperineal rectum resection between 2013 and 2018 were collected retrospectively. Occurrences of parastomal hernia and reoperation rate due to parastomal hernia in patients with and without a prophylactic mesh were compared by univariate, multivariate, and propensity score-adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-two (28.9%) of the 76 included patients received a prophylactic mesh. The mean follow-up was 39.3 ± 23.8 months. Mesh implantation reduced the incidence of parastomal hernia to 9.1% (n = 2) compared to 42.6% (n = 23) in patients without a prophylactic mesh. The propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.48, p = 0.001). No reoperations due to parastomal hernia were needed in patients who received a prophylactic mesh, while nine patients without mesh (16.7%) required parastomal hernia repair (HR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.00-1.76, p = 0.015). Mesh implantation was not associated with increased short-term morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2, 31.8% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.468) or 30-day mortality (4.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic implantation of a 3D funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh is a safe and effective method to prevent parastomal hernia in patients requiring permanent end colostomy. Mesh placement significantly reduces reoperations due to parastomal hernia.
1
In 76 patients undergoing abdominoperineal rectum resection with permanent end colostomy, prophylactic funnel mesh reduced parastomal hernia incidence from 42.6% to 9.1%.
2
No mesh-treated patients required reoperation for parastomal hernia, compared with 16.7% of patients without mesh (HR 0.09; p = 0.015).
3
Propensity score-adjusted analysis showed a significantly lower parastomal hernia risk with mesh implantation (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.48; p = 0.001).
4
Prophylactic mesh was not associated with increased short-term morbidity or 30-day mortality.
5
The retrospective findings support 3D funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh as a safe and effective preventive strategy, although the study design limits causal conclusions.

Patients undergoing abdominoperineal rectal resection with permanent end colostomy

The effectiveness and safety of prophylactic 3D funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh implantation in preventing parastomal hernia and related reoperations

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-07-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
16
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yanic Ammann
Bernhard Widmann
Moritz Sparn
René Warschkow
Michael Weitzendorfer
Walter Brunner
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%