RuWritingStyles: Russian Claude custom styles and an agentic review pipeline for scholarly writing on Sanskrit linguistics

RuWritingStyles: пользовательские стили Claude на русском языке и агентный конвейер рецензирования научных текстов по санскритской лингвистике
Mārcis Gasūns
2026-07-31

GOST R 7.0.100-2018IAST/Cyrillic transliterationRussian scholarly writingSanskrit linguisticsagentic review pipeline
RuWritingStyles is a bilingual resource for scholarly writing on Sanskrit linguistics in Russian. It combines (1) a catalogue of Russian-language Claude custom-style prompts modelled on the prose method of major philologists (Zaliznyak, Tronsky, Mel'čuk, Elizarenkova, Toporov, Lidova and others), and (2) a zero-runtime-dependency agentic review pipeline that runs a multi-style "Council" over a Markdown manuscript (segment, independent style reviews, council deliberation, revision, verification) with deterministic Sanskrit quality checks: IAST/Cyrillic transliteration consistency, GOST R 7.0.100-2018 bibliography formatting, and citation grounding. Review panels are selectable by named council (general / sanskrit / indology). Quality is measured, not assumed: an N-averaged gold-case benchmark (5 Sanskrit gold cases × N=5 runs) shows detection of planted philological errors at 24/25 = 0.96; engine-side span-patch reconstruction with a document-growth budget raised the end-to-end pass rate from 0.48 to 0.92 with zero diff failures. The gold set carries a disclosed two-rater annotation (mechanical scorer vs an independent frontier model, agreement 24/25); the methodology paper draft, the benchmark protocol and all run artifacts are included for reproducibility.
1
Deterministic checks target IAST/Cyrillic transliteration consistency, GOST R 7.0.100-2018 bibliography formatting, and citation grounding.
2
Engine-side span-patch reconstruction with a document-growth budget increased the end-to-end pass rate from 0.48 to 0.92 without diff failures; annotation agreement was 24/25 between two raters.
3
In an N-averaged benchmark of five Sanskrit gold cases across five runs, the system detected planted philological errors in 24 of 25 cases, achieving 0.96 detection accuracy.
4
RuWritingStyles provides a bilingual Russian resource combining Claude custom-style prompts modeled on major Sanskrit and Russian philologists with an automated scholarly-writing review pipeline.
5
The zero-runtime-dependency pipeline uses independent style reviews, council deliberation, revision, and verification over Markdown manuscripts, with selectable general, Sanskrit, and Indology panels.

RuWritingStyles: a bilingual resource and agentic review pipeline for Russian scholarly writing on Sanskrit linguistics

The pipeline’s multi-style scholarly review, deterministic Sanskrit quality checks, and detection and correction performance on planted philological errors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-07-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mārcis Gasūns
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%