Optimizing computed tomography image reconstruction for focal hepatic lesions: Deep learning image reconstruction vs iterative reconstruction

Voraparee Suvannarerg, Chulaluk Komoltri, Varin Jaruvongvanich, Kobkun Muangsomboon, Wanwarang Teerasamit, Sastrawut Thammakittiphan, Wimonrat Lornimitdee, Witchuda Ritsamrej, Parinya Chaisue, Napapong Pongnapang, Piyaporn Apisarnthanarak
2024-07-17

SCID:  54.1/ymxh5cqv
Background: Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is a novel computed tomography (CT) reconstruction technique that minimizes image noise, enhances image quality, and enables radiation dose reduction. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of DLIR and iterative reconstruction (IR) in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 216 focal hepatic lesions in 109 adult participants who underwent abdominal CT scanning at our institution. We used DLIR (low, medium, and high strength) and IR (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, and 30 %) techniques for image reconstruction. Four experienced abdominal radiologists independently evaluated focal hepatic lesions based on five qualitative aspects (lesion detectability, lesion border, diagnostic confidence level, image artifact, and overall image quality). Quantitatively, we measured and compared the level of image noise for each technique at the liver and aorta. Results: < 0.001) among the seven reconstruction techniques in terms of lesion borders, image artifacts, and overall image quality. Low-strength DLIR (DLIR-L) exhibited the best overall image quality. Although high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) had the least image noise and fewest artifacts, it also had the lowest scores for lesion borders and overall image quality. Image noise showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with participants' body mass index and waist circumference. Conclusions: The optimal-strength DLIR significantly improved overall image quality for evaluating focal hepatic lesions compared to the IR technique. DLIR-L achieved the best overall image quality while maintaining acceptable levels of image noise and quality of lesion borders.
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-07-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Voraparee Suvannarerg
Chulaluk Komoltri
Varin Jaruvongvanich
Kobkun Muangsomboon
Wanwarang Teerasamit
Sastrawut Thammakittiphan
Wimonrat Lornimitdee
Witchuda Ritsamrej
Parinya Chaisue
Napapong Pongnapang
Piyaporn Apisarnthanarak
Explore More Research
Use the citation graph to discover related papers and expand your research horizons.
Click any node to explore
Download PDF
100%