Clinical Significance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Клиническое значение спонтанных портосистемных шунтов при трансплантации печени от живого донора
Marc‐Antoine Allard, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Takashi Kokudo, Kosuke Kobayashi, Junichi Kaneko, Takeaki Ishizawa, Junichi Arita, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
2020-05-16

living donor liver transplantationportal complicationsportal vein thrombosissplenorenal shuntspontaneous portosystemic shunts
Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are commonly observed in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, their impact on the outcome after transplantation is unclear. We aimed to assess the type, size, and the effects of SPSS on outcomes after LDLT. A total of 339 LDLT recipients in a single institution were included. The type and diameter of the SPSS (splenorenal shunt [SRS], oesogastric shunt, and umbilical shunt) were retrospectively analyzed. A large shunt was defined as having a diameter ≤7 mm. No portal flow modulation was attempted over time. Portal complications were defined as stenosis, thrombosis, or hepatofugal flow requiring any treatment after transplantation. There were 202 (59.0%) patients who exhibited at least 1 large SPSS. Neither the size nor type of SPSS was associated with mortality, morbidity, or liver function recovery. However, the incidence of portal complications was significantly higher in patients with a large SRS (8.6% versus 2.9%; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis of portal complications revealed 2 independent predictors: pre-LT portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and SRS size. The observed risk among recipients with pre-LT PVT was 8.3% when the SRS was ≤7 mm, but increased to 38.5% when the SRS was >15 mm. The present study suggests that large SPSS do not negatively affect the outcomes after LDLT. However, a large SRS is associated with a higher risk of portal complications, particularly in recipients with pre-LT PVT, for whom intraoperative intervention for SRS should be considered. Otherwise, a conservative approach to SPSS during LDLT seems reasonable.
1
Among 339 living donor liver transplant recipients, 59.0% had at least one large spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS).
2
Intraoperative intervention for large splenorenal shunts should be considered in recipients with pretransplant portal vein thrombosis, whereas conservative SPSS management is generally reasonable.
3
Large splenorenal shunts were associated with a significantly higher incidence of portal complications than smaller or absent large shunts (8.6% versus 2.9%; P = 0.04).
4
Pretransplant portal vein thrombosis and splenorenal shunt size independently predicted portal complications; in patients with pretransplant thrombosis, risk increased from 8.3% with shunts ≤7 mm to 38.5% with shunts >15 mm.
5
SPSS size and type were not associated with mortality, overall morbidity, or recovery of liver function after transplantation.

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts in living donor liver transplant recipients

The association of shunt type and size, particularly large splenorenal shunts, with post-transplant portal complications and other outcomes

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-05-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Marc‐Antoine Allard
Nobuhisa Akamatsu
Takashi Kokudo
Kosuke Kobayashi
Junichi Kaneko
Takeaki Ishizawa
Junichi Arita
Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%