Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock
Инфузия вазопрессина по сравнению с норадреналином у пациентов с септическим шоком
2008-02-27
SCID: 54.1/yz55bed7
Discuss with AI
28-day mortalitylow-dose vasopressinnorepinephrine infusionrandomized double-blind trialseptic shock
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Vasopressin is commonly used as an adjunct to catecholamines to support blood pressure in refractory septic shock, but its effect on mortality is unknown. We hypothesized that low-dose vasopressin as compared with norepinephrine would decrease mortality among patients with septic shock who were being treated with conventional (catecholamine) vasopressors. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients who had septic shock and were receiving a minimum of 5 microg of norepinephrine per minute to receive either low-dose vasopressin (0.01 to 0.03 U per minute) or norepinephrine (5 to 15 microg per minute) in addition to open-label vasopressors. All vasopressor infusions were titrated and tapered according to protocols to maintain a target blood pressure. The primary end point was the mortality rate 28 days after the start of infusions. RESULTS: A total of 778 patients underwent randomization, were infused with the study drug (396 patients received vasopressin, and 382 norepinephrine), and were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and norepinephrine groups in the 28-day mortality rate (35.4% and 39.3%, respectively; P=0.26) or in 90-day mortality (43.9% and 49.6%, respectively; P=0.11). There were no significant differences in the overall rates of serious adverse events (10.3% and 10.5%, respectively; P=1.00). In the prospectively defined stratum of less severe septic shock, the mortality rate was lower in the vasopressin group than in the norepinephrine group at 28 days (26.5% vs. 35.7%, P=0.05); in the stratum of more severe septic shock, there was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (44.0% and 42.5%, respectively; P=0.76). A test for heterogeneity between these two study strata was not significant (P=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose vasopressin did not reduce mortality rates as compared with norepinephrine among patients with septic shock who were treated with catecholamine vasopressors. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN94845869 [controlled-trials.com].).
Key Findings
1
Among patients with less severe septic shock, 28-day mortality was lower with vasopressin than norepinephrine (26.5% vs. 35.7%, P=0.05), but this subgroup interaction was not statistically significant.
2
In a multicenter randomized double-blind trial of 778 septic-shock patients, low-dose vasopressin did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality versus norepinephrine.
3
Overall serious adverse-event rates were similar between vasopressin and norepinephrine groups: 10.3% versus 10.5% (P=1.00).
4
The trial concludes that low-dose vasopressin should not replace norepinephrine to reduce mortality in catecholamine-treated septic shock.
5
Twenty-eight-day mortality was 35.4% with vasopressin and 39.3% with norepinephrine (P=0.26); 90-day mortality was 43.9% and 49.6%, respectively (P=0.11).
Research Object
Patients with septic shock receiving catecholamine vasopressors
Research Subject
Comparative effects of low-dose vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion on 28-day and 90-day mortality and serious adverse events
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-02-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest