Field performance of the malaria highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test in a setting of varying malaria transmission

Binta Saidy, John Bradley, Hannah Slater, Chris Drakeley, Teun Bousema, Julia Mwesigwa, Fatima Ceesay, Charles Whittaker, Ballah Kandeh, Davis Nkwakamna, Jean‐Pierre Van Geertruyden, Jane Achan, Umberto D’Alessandro
2019-08-27

SCID:  54.1/z9rerbjf
BACKGROUND: The Gambia has successfully reduced malaria transmission. The human reservoir of infection could further decrease if malaria-infected individuals could be identified by highly sensitive, field-based, diagnostic tools and then treated. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was done at the peak of the 2017 malaria season in 47 Gambian villages. From each village, 100 residents were randomly selected for finger-prick blood samples to detect Plasmodium falciparum infections using highly sensitive rapid diagnostic tests (HS-RDT) and PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the HS-RDT were estimated (assuming PCR as the gold standard) across varying transmission intensities and in different age groups. A deterministic, age-structured, dynamic model of malaria transmission was used to estimate the impact of mass testing and treatment (MTAT) with HS-RDT in four different scenarios of malaria prevalence by PCR: 5, 15, 30, and 60%, and with seasonal transmission. The impact was compared both to MTAT with conventional RDT and mass drug administration (MDA). RESULTS: Malaria prevalence by HS-RDT was 15% (570/3798; 95% CI 13.9-16.1). The HS-RDT sensitivity and specificity were 38.4% (191/497, 95% CI 34.2-42.71) and 88.5% (2922/3301; 95% CI 87.4-89.6), respectively. Sensitivity was the highest (50.9%, 95% CI 43.3-58.5%) in high prevalence villages (20-50% by PCR). The model predicted that in very low transmission areas (≤ 5%), three monthly rounds of MTAT with HS-RDT, starting towards the end of the dry season and testing 65 or 85% of the population for 2 consecutive years, would avert 62 or 78% of malaria cases (over 2 years), respectively. The effect of the intervention would be lower in a moderate transmission setting. In all settings, MDA would be superior to MTAT with HS-RDT which would be superior to MTAT with conventional RDT. CONCLUSION: The HS-RDT's field sensitivity was modest and varied by transmission intensity. In low to very low transmission areas, three monthly rounds per year of MTAT with HS-RDT at 85% coverage for 2 consecutive years would reduce malaria prevalence to such low levels that additional strategies may achieve elimination. The model prediction would need to be confirmed by cluster-randomized trials.
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-08-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Binta Saidy
John Bradley
Hannah Slater
Chris Drakeley
Teun Bousema
Julia Mwesigwa
Fatima Ceesay
Charles Whittaker
Ballah Kandeh
Davis Nkwakamna
Jean‐Pierre Van Geertruyden
Jane Achan
Umberto D’Alessandro
Explore More Research
Use the citation graph to discover related papers and expand your research horizons.
Click any node to explore
Download PDF
100%