Beta-blockers for secondary prevention following myocardial infarction in patients without reduced ejection fraction or heart failure: an updated meta-analysis

Abdulla A. Damluji, Michael G. Nanna, Pei‐Lun Lee, Yu‐Tzu Chang, Junmin Song, Kuan‐Yu Chi, Ishmum Chowdhury, Zafer Akman, Sridhar Mangalesh, Vikyath Satish, Golsa Babapour, Yi‐No Kang, Rachel Schwartz, Pawel Borkowski, Michele Nanna
2024-09-19

SCID:  54.1/zdrbchpp
AIMS: The 2023 ESC guidelines for acute coronary syndrome note that contemporary data are heterogenous regarding beta-blocker (BB) use post-myocardial infarction (MI) in patients without reduced ejection fraction (EF) or heart failure (HF). We aimed to address the heterogeneity in contemporary data around BB post-MI in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched six databases from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2024 to identify contemporary studies enrolling MI patients without reduced EF (≤40%) or history of HF receiving BB at index MI and comparing outcomes between BB users and non-users. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the restricted maximum likelihood method. There were 24 studies including 290 349 patients enrolled in the contemporary era. Overall, BB use was associated with a significant 11% reduction in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.97; I2 = 40], however with moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Pre-specified subgroup analyses demonstrate comparable all-cause mortality (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; I2 = 0%), CV mortality (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; I2 = 0%), and MACCE (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52; I2 = 0%) in patients with a 1-year event-free period, defined as no death, recurrent MI, or HF while on BB following index MI. In patients with no event-free period, meta-regression revealed that BB mortality benefits were modified by the study inclusion period (P = 0.01), reflecting a temporal trend of decreasing BB mortality benefits over time. Based on the temporal trend, in patients with preserved EF post-2010, BB exhibited no reduction in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04; I2 = 0%), but a non-significant trend towards increased CV mortality (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.96-1.72; I2 = 0%) and a significant increase in MACCE (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: In the contemporary reperfusion era, BB may not confer additional mortality benefits beyond a 1-year event-free period post-MI in patients without reduced EF. Moreover, post-MI BB use was associated with detrimental effects in patients with preserved EF.
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-09-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Abdulla A. Damluji
Michael G. Nanna
Pei‐Lun Lee
Yu‐Tzu Chang
Junmin Song
Kuan‐Yu Chi
Ishmum Chowdhury
Zafer Akman
Sridhar Mangalesh
Vikyath Satish
Golsa Babapour
Yi‐No Kang
Rachel Schwartz
Pawel Borkowski
Michele Nanna
Explore More Research
Use the citation graph to discover related papers and expand your research horizons.
Click any node to explore
Download PDF
100%