The water footprint of bioenergy
Водный след биоэнергетики
2009-06-04
SCID: 54.1/zfjs5g6j
Discuss with AI
bioelectricitybioenergybiofuelsenergy cropswater footprint
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
All energy scenarios show a shift toward an increased percentage of renewable energy sources, including biomass. This study gives an overview of water footprints (WFs) of bioenergy from 12 crops that currently contribute the most to global agricultural production: barley, cassava, maize, potato, rapeseed, rice, rye, sorghum, soybean, sugar beet, sugar cane, and wheat. In addition, this study includes jatropha, a suitable energy crop. Since climate and production circumstances differ among regions, calculations have been performed by country. The WF of bioelectricity is smaller than that of biofuels because it is more efficient to use total biomass (e.g., for electricity or heat) than a fraction of the crop (its sugar, starch, or oil content) for biofuel. The WF of bioethanol appears to be smaller than that of biodiesel. For electricity, sugar beet, maize, and sugar cane are the most favorable crops [50 m(3)/gigajoule (GJ)]. Rapeseed and jatropha, typical energy crops, are disadvantageous (400 m(3)/GJ). For ethanol, sugar beet, and potato (60 and 100 m(3)/GJ) are the most advantageous, followed by sugar cane (110 m(3)/GJ); sorghum (400 m(3)/GJ) is the most unfavorable. For biodiesel, soybean and rapeseed show to be the most favorable WF (400 m(3)/GJ); jatropha has an adverse WF (600 m(3)/GJ). When expressed per L, the WF ranges from 1,400 to 20,000 L of water per L of biofuel. If a shift toward a greater contribution of bioenergy to energy supply takes place, the results of this study can be used to select the crops and countries that produce bioenergy in the most water-efficient way.
Key Findings
1
Bioelectricity has a smaller water footprint than biofuels because using total biomass is more efficient than converting only crop sugar, starch, or oil.
2
Bioethanol generally has a smaller water footprint than biodiesel, with biofuel footprints ranging from 1,400 to 20,000 liters of water per liter.
3
For bioelectricity, sugar beet, maize, and sugar cane are most favorable at approximately 50 m³/GJ, whereas rapeseed and jatropha reach approximately 400 m³/GJ.
4
For ethanol, sugar beet and potato are most favorable at 60 and 100 m³/GJ; for biodiesel, soybean and rapeseed are most favorable at approximately 400 m³/GJ, while jatropha is least favorable at 600 m³/GJ.
5
The study quantifies country-specific water footprints of bioenergy from 12 major crops and the energy crop jatropha.
Research Object
Bioenergy produced from agricultural crops, including 12 major crops and jatropha, across different countries
Research Subject
Country-specific water footprints and water-use efficiency of bioelectricity, bioethanol, and biodiesel produced from these crops
Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-06-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest