Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: systematic review andmeta-analysis

Распространенность Mycoplasma genitalium в различных группах населения: систематический обзор и метаанализ
Lukas Baumann, Manuel Cina, Dianne Egli-Gany, Myrofora Goutaki, Florian S. Halbeisen, Gian-Reto Lohrer, Hammad Ali, Pippa Scott, Nicola Low
2018-02-09

Mycoplasma genitaliummen who have sex with menmeta-analysisprevalencesystematic review
Background Mycoplasma genitalium is a common cause of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis. Testing of asymptomatic populations has been proposed, but prevalence in asymptomatic populations is not well established. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of M. genitalium in the general population, pregnant women, men who have sex with men (MSM), commercial sex workers (CSWs) and clinic-based samples, Methods We searched Embase, Medline, IndMED, African Index Medicus and LILACS from 1 January 1991 to 12 July 2016 without language restrictions. We included studies with 500 participants or more. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies and extracted data. We examined forest plots and conducted random-effects meta-analysis to estimate prevalence, if appropriate. Between-study heterogeneity was examined using the I 2 statistic and meta-regression. Results Of 3316 screened records, 63 were included. In randomly selected samples from the general population, the summary prevalence was 1.3% (95% CI 1.0% to 1.8%, I 2 41.5%, three studies, 9091 people) in countries with higher levels of development and 3.9% (95% CI 2.2 to 6.7, I 2 89.2%, three studies, 3809 people) in countries with lower levels. Prevalence was similar in women and men (P=0.47). In clinic based samples, prevalence estimates were higher, except in asymptomatic patients (0.8%, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.4, I 2 0.0%, three studies, 2889 people). Summary prevalence estimates were, in the following groups: pregnant women 0.9% (95% CI 0.6% to 1.4%, I 2 0%, four studies, 3472 people), MSM in the community 3.2% (95% CI 2.1 to 5.1, I 2 78.3%, five studies, 3012 people) and female CSWs in the community 15.9% (95% CI 13.5 to 18.9, I 2 79.9%, four studies, 4006 people). Discussion This systematic review can inform testing guidelines for M. genitalium . The low estimated prevalence of M. genitalium in the general population, pregnant women and asymptomatic attenders at clinics does not support expansion of testing to these groups. Registration numbers PROSPERO: CRD42015020420
1
Among randomly selected general-population samples, M. genitalium prevalence was 1.3% in higher-development countries and 3.9% in lower-development countries.
2
Community prevalence was higher among MSM (3.2%) and especially female commercial sex workers (15.9%).
3
Estimated prevalence was 0.9% among pregnant women and 0.8% among asymptomatic clinic attendees.
4
Prevalence was similar in women and men in the general population, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.47).
5
The low prevalence in the general population, pregnant women, and asymptomatic clinic attendees does not support expanded routine testing; clinic-based prevalence was generally higher in symptomatic populations.

Mycoplasma genitalium infection in general-population, pregnant-women, MSM, commercial-sex-worker, and clinic-based populations

Prevalence and between-group variation of M. genitalium infection, including differences by population type, sex, development level, and symptomatic status

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-02-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Lukas Baumann
Manuel Cina
Dianne Egli-Gany
Myrofora Goutaki
Florian S. Halbeisen
Gian-Reto Lohrer
Hammad Ali
Pippa Scott
Nicola Low
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%