Dam removal: Listening in

Демонтаж плотин: прислушиваясь к реке
Melissa M. Foley, J. Ryan Bellmore, Jim E. O’Connor, Jeffrey J. Duda, Amy E. East, G. E. Grant, Chauncey W. Anderson, Jennifer A. Bountry, Mathias J. Collins, Patrick J. Connolly, Laura S. Craig, James E. Evans, Sharon L. Greene, Francis J. Magilligan, Christopher S. Magirl, Jon J. Major, G. R. Pess, Timothy J. Randle, Patrick B. Shafroth, Christian E. Torgersen, Desirèe Tullos, Andrew C. Wilcox
2017-07-01

dam removalriver connectivityriver restorationriverine ecosystem responsessediment erosion
Abstract Dam removal is widely used as an approach for river restoration in the United States. The increase in dam removals—particularly large dams—and associated dam‐removal studies over the last few decades motivated a working group at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis to review and synthesize available studies of dam removals and their findings. Based on dam removals thus far, some general conclusions have emerged: (1) physical responses are typically fast, with the rate of sediment erosion largely dependent on sediment characteristics and dam‐removal strategy; (2) ecological responses to dam removal differ among the affected upstream, downstream, and reservoir reaches; (3) dam removal tends to quickly reestablish connectivity, restoring the movement of material and organisms between upstream and downstream river reaches; (4) geographic context, river history, and land use significantly influence river restoration trajectories and recovery potential because they control broader physical and ecological processes and conditions; and (5) quantitative modeling capability is improving, particularly for physical and broad‐scale ecological effects, and gives managers information needed to understand and predict long‐term effects of dam removal on riverine ecosystems. Although these studies collectively enhance our understanding of how riverine ecosystems respond to dam removal, knowledge gaps remain because most studies have been short (< 5 years) and do not adequately represent the diversity of dam types, watershed conditions, and dam‐removal methods in the U.S.
1
Dam removal rapidly reestablishes river connectivity, restoring movement of materials and organisms between upstream and downstream reaches.
2
Ecological responses vary among upstream, downstream, and former reservoir reaches following dam removal.
3
Geographic context, river history, and land use strongly influence restoration trajectories and recovery potential.
4
Physical responses to dam removal are typically rapid, with sediment-erosion rates depending mainly on sediment characteristics and removal strategy.
5
Quantitative modeling is improving for physical and broad-scale ecological effects, but evidence remains limited by predominantly short studies and underrepresentation of dam and watershed diversity.

dam removal in United States riverine ecosystems

physical, ecological, and connectivity responses, including sediment erosion, ecosystem recovery trajectories, and long-term restoration effects

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Melissa M. Foley
J. Ryan Bellmore
Jim E. O’Connor
Jeffrey J. Duda
Amy E. East
G. E. Grant
Chauncey W. Anderson
Jennifer A. Bountry
Mathias J. Collins
Patrick J. Connolly
Laura S. Craig
James E. Evans
Sharon L. Greene
Francis J. Magilligan
Christopher S. Magirl
Jon J. Major
G. R. Pess
Timothy J. Randle
Patrick B. Shafroth
Christian E. Torgersen
Desirèe Tullos
Andrew C. Wilcox
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%