Nonoperative vs Operative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

Неоперативное и оперативное лечение неосложнённого острого аппендицита
Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Dong Joo Seo, Bárbara Gómez-Eslava, S. Hossain, Arnaud Lesegretain, Alexandre Venâncio de Souza, Camden Bay, Bruno Zilberstein, Evaldo Marchi, Rogério Bonassi Machado, Leandro Cardoso Barchi, Rocco Ricciardi
2022-07-27

appendectomymeta-analysisnonoperative managementrandomized clinical trialsuncomplicated acute appendicitis
Importance: Appendectomy remains the standard of care for uncomplicated acute appendicitis despite several randomized clinical trials pointing to the safety and efficacy of nonoperative management of this disease. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials may contribute to the body of evidence and help surgeons select which patients may benefit from surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of nonoperative management vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (Embase and PubMed) to search for published randomized clinical trials in English comparing nonoperative management with appendectomy in adult patients presenting with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. To increase sensitivity, no limits were set for outcomes reported, sex, or year of publication. All nonrandomized or quasi-randomized trials were excluded, and validated primers were used. Study Selection: Among 1504 studies imported for screening, 805 were duplicates, and 595 were excluded for irrelevancy. A further 96 were excluded after full-text review, mainly owing to wrong study design or inclusion of pediatric populations. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Meta-extraction was conducted with independent extraction by multiple reviewers using the Covidence platform for systematic reviews and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled by a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment success and major adverse effects at 30 days' follow-up. Results: The main outcome (treatment success proportion at 30 days of follow-up) was not significantly different in the operative and nonoperative management cohorts (risk ratio [RR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.11). Likewise, the percentage of major adverse effects was similar in both cohorts (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.79). However, in the nonoperative management group, length of stay was significantly longer (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70), and a median cumulative incidence of 18% of recurrent appendicitis was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: These results point to the general safety and efficacy of nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, this strategy may be associated with an increase in duration of hospital stay and a higher rate of recurrent appendicitis. This meta-analysis may help inform decision-making in nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
1
A systematic review and meta-analysis included eight randomized clinical trials comparing nonoperative management with appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults.
2
The abstract is truncated after reporting that nonoperative management showed no significant difference in the main outcomes; further findings cannot be determined from the provided text.
3
The proportion of major adverse effects at 30 days was similar between treatment strategies (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.79).
4
Thirty-day treatment success did not differ significantly between operative and nonoperative management (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.11).

adult patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis

the comparative efficacy and safety of nonoperative management versus appendectomy, including 30-day treatment success and major adverse effects

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-07-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
112
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite
Dong Joo Seo
Bárbara Gómez-Eslava
S. Hossain
Arnaud Lesegretain
Alexandre Venâncio de Souza
Camden Bay
Bruno Zilberstein
Evaldo Marchi
Rogério Bonassi Machado
Leandro Cardoso Barchi
Rocco Ricciardi
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%