A cost roadmap for silicon heterojunction solar cells
Дорожная карта снижения стоимости солнечных элементов с кремниевым гетеропереходом
2016-01-16
SCID: 54.1/zpp33a6a
Discuss with AI
interdigitated back-contacted designlife-cycle costingproduction cost analysissilicon heterojunction solar cellssilver paste consumption
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Research and development of silicon heterojunction (SHJ) solar cells has seen a marked increase since the recent expiry of core patents describing SHJ technology. SHJ solar cells are expected to offer various cost benefits compared to conventional crystalline silicon solar cells. This paper analyses the production costs associated with five different SHJ cell designs, including an interdigitated back-contacted (IBC) design. Using life-cycle costing, we analyzed the current cost breakdown of these SHJ designs, and compared them to conventional diffused junction monocrystalline silicon modules. Coupling the results for current designs with literature data on technological improvements, we also present a prospective analysis of production costs for the five SHJ cells and modules. For current designs, module costs were calculated to be 0.48–0.56 USD per Watt-peak (Wp) for SHJ modules, compared to 0.50 USD/Wp for a conventional c-Si module. The efficiency bonus for SHJ modules compared to conventional c-Si modules is offset by a strong increase in metallization costs for SHJ designs, as comparatively large amounts of low-temperature silver-paste are required. For module materials, the requirement for conductive adhesives results in a small cost penalty for SHJ modules compared to c-Si modules, which is more than balanced by the effect of higher efficiency in SHJ modules. Our prospective study showed that improvements in cell processing and module design could result in a significant drop in production costs for all module types studied. The SHJ modules gain much advantage by reducing and replacing silver consumption, increased cell efficiency and thinner wafers and have prospective production costs of 0.29–0.35 USD/Wp. Conventional c-Si module cost is less sensitive to silver paste consumption, limiting the potential for cost reduction, and has prospective production costs of 0.33 USD/Wp. Replacement of indium-tin-oxide was not found to contribute substantially to a reduction in module costs.
Key Findings
1
Conductive adhesives impose a small material-cost penalty for SHJ modules, but this is more than offset by their higher efficiency.
2
Current SHJ module costs are estimated at 0.48–0.56 USD/Wp, compared with 0.50 USD/Wp for conventional monocrystalline silicon modules.
3
Prospective improvements in silver reduction or replacement, cell efficiency, and wafer thinning could lower SHJ module costs to 0.29–0.35 USD/Wp, compared with 0.33 USD/Wp for conventional c-Si modules; replacing indium-tin-oxide offers little cost benefit.
4
SHJ efficiency advantages are offset by substantially higher metallization costs because the designs require relatively large amounts of low-temperature silver paste.
5
The study evaluates production costs for five silicon heterojunction cell designs, including an interdigitated back-contact configuration, using life-cycle costing.
Research Object
Silicon heterojunction (SHJ) solar cell and module designs, including an interdigitated back-contacted design, compared with conventional crystalline-silicon modules
Research Subject
Current and prospective production costs and cost drivers of SHJ cell and module designs, including the effects of metallization, silver consumption, conductive adhesives, efficiency, wafer thickness, and cell-processing and module-design improvements
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest