Система збору данини до правління Святослава Ігоровича

Система сбора дани до правления Святослава Игоревича
А. А. Настюк, Sergei Tretiak
2021-01-01

Byzantine marketsKhazar tribute modelKievan Rus’polyudyatribute collection system
This article deals with the origin and development of the system of collecting tribute in Kievan Rus’ before the reign of Sviatoslav Igorevich. We analyzed some Arab sources in which we obtained data on the tax system of Rus’ and Slavs before the arrival of Rurik.We found that the Rus’ and the Slavs had essential¬ly different systems of tribute collection. If the Russ tax system was based on interest deductions in favor of the hakan and depended directly on profits, robbery and trade, the Slavs revenues to the king’s treasury depended on the amount of food produced, which, in turn, affected the number of families.The next stage of our study was the period of creation of tax collection global system, which the Byzantine em¬peror Constantine the Bagrianorodnyi called “polyudya”. An analysis of chronicle sources indicated that the system began to take shape after Oleg had taken over Kyiv. We came to the conclusion that the Khazar model was mostly based on the system of paying tribute.We’ve found that individual and family taxation is replaced by a unit tax. The chronicles indicate that from the very beginning of the formation of the tribute system,payments were fixed and could change only after attempts at uprisings by the tributaries. It should be noted that the people prompted the princely power to look for profitable and large centers for the sale of raw materials. According to these criteria, Byzantium became such a center.We found out that the dependence of the human sys¬tem on the Byzantine markets led to a financial catastro¬phe during the reign of Igor Rurikovich. It is just the catastrophe, in our opinion, that caused the crisis in the tax system. We believe that it was the lack of funds in the treasury of the Rus Prince due to the economic blockade of Byzantium and led to the fact that the tribute relations with the Drevlians were broken.In our study, we came to the conclusion that the ac¬tions of Princess Olga were not aimed at establishing a new system of tax collection, but to launch the old one, which was destroyed by Igor Rurikovich.
1
Before Rurik, Rus’ and Slavic communities used fundamentally different tribute systems: Rus’ taxation depended on profits, robbery, and trade, while Slavic revenues reflected food production and family numbers.
2
Dependence on Byzantine markets made the Rus’ tribute system financially vulnerable; Byzantium’s economic blockade caused a treasury shortfall during Igor’s reign and contributed to the breakdown of tribute relations with the Drevlians.
3
During this transition, individual and family-based taxation was replaced by a unit tax with initially fixed payments, altered mainly after tributary uprisings.
4
The abstract indicates that Princess Olga’s actions were not aimed at establishing an entirely new system, although the claim is truncated in the provided text.
5
The comprehensive polyudya tribute system began forming after Oleg’s capture of Kyiv and was largely modeled on the Khazar tribute system.

The tribute-collection system in Kievan Rus’ before and during the reign of Sviatoslav Igorevich

The origin, development, structure, and crisis of tribute-collection mechanisms, including their tax bases, payment units, fixed rates, economic dependencies, and transformation under princely rule

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
А. А. Настюк
Sergei Tretiak
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%