The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments
Заявления BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil и Shell о чистой энергетике: несоответствие между дискурсом, действиями и инвестициями
2022-02-16
SCID: 54.1/2vrdygmm
Discuss with AI
clean energy transitiondecarbonization strategiesfossil fuel dependencegreenwashingoil and gas majors
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The energy products of oil and gas majors have contributed significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and planetary warming over the past century. Decarbonizing the global economy by mid-century to avoid dangerous climate change thus cannot occur without a profound transformation of their fossil fuel-based business models. Recently, several majors are increasingly discussing clean energy and climate change, pledging decarbonization strategies, and investing in alternative energies. Some even claim to be transforming into clean energy companies. Given a history of obstructive climate actions and "greenwashing", there is a need to objectively evaluate current and historical decarbonization efforts and investment behavior. This study focuses on two American (Chevron, ExxonMobil) and two European majors (BP, Shell). Using data collected over 2009-2020, we comparatively examine the extent of decarbonization and clean energy transition activity from three perspectives: (1) keyword use in annual reports (discourse); (2) business strategies (pledges and actions); and (3) production, expenditures and earnings for fossil fuels along with investments in clean energy (investments). We found a strong increase in discourse related to "climate", "low-carbon" and "transition", especially by BP and Shell. Similarly, we observed increasing tendencies toward strategies related to decarbonization and clean energy. But these are dominated by pledges rather than concrete actions. Moreover, the financial analysis reveals a continuing business model dependence on fossil fuels along with insignificant and opaque spending on clean energy. We thus conclude that the transition to clean energy business models is not occurring, since the magnitude of investments and actions does not match discourse. Until actions and investment behavior are brought into alignment with discourse, accusations of greenwashing appear well-founded.
Key Findings
1
All four companies increasingly adopted decarbonization and clean-energy strategies, but these were dominated by pledges rather than concrete actions.
2
Clean-energy spending remained insignificant and opaque compared with fossil-fuel business activity.
3
Financial analysis found continued dependence on fossil-fuel production, expenditures, and earnings across BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell.
4
From 2009–2020, BP and Shell showed the strongest increases in annual-report discourse concerning climate, low-carbon activities, and energy transition.
5
The companies’ actions and investments did not match their clean-energy discourse, supporting the conclusion that their business-model transition was not occurring and that greenwashing accusations were well-founded.
Research Object
BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell’s fossil-fuel-based business models and clean-energy transition activities
Research Subject
The alignment and extent of these companies’ decarbonization discourse, strategies, actions, fossil-fuel dependence, and clean-energy investments
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-02-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
210
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest