Discourses of climate delay

Дискурсы отсрочки климатических действий
Giulio Mattioli, Felix Creutzig, J. Timmons Roberts, Jan C. Minx, William F. Lamb, Stuart Capstick, J. Steinberger, Finn Müller-Hansen, Sebastian Levi, Trevor Culhane
2020-01-01

climate actionclimate change mitigationclimate delay discoursesclimate policyclimate policy social effects
Non-technical summary ‘Discourses of climate delay’ pervade current debates on climate action. These discourses accept the existence of climate change, but justify inaction or inadequate efforts. In contemporary discussions on what actions should be taken, by whom and how fast, proponents of climate delay would argue for minimal action or action taken by others. They focus attention on the negative social effects of climate policies and raise doubt that mitigation is possible. Here, we outline the common features of climate delay discourses and provide a guide to identifying them.
1
Climate delay discourses acknowledge climate change while justifying inaction or insufficient climate efforts.
2
Climate delay narratives emphasize the negative social effects of climate policies and cast doubt on the feasibility of mitigation.
3
The paper identifies common features of climate delay discourses and provides guidance for recognizing them in contemporary climate debates.
4
These discourses advocate minimal action, delayed action, or shifting responsibility for climate action onto others.

climate delay discourses

their common features and identification in debates on climate action

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Giulio Mattioli
Felix Creutzig
J. Timmons Roberts
Jan C. Minx
William F. Lamb
Stuart Capstick
J. Steinberger
Finn Müller-Hansen
Sebastian Levi
Trevor Culhane
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%