Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews
Цифровое здравоохранение и телемедицина в онкологической помощи: скоупинг-обзор обзоров
2023-04-24
SCID: 54.1/8nqzkftp
Discuss with AI
cancer caredigital healthremote cancer carescoping reviewtelehealth
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote cancer care delivery via the internet and telephone, rapidly accelerating an already growing care delivery model and associated research. This scoping review of reviews characterised the peer-reviewed literature reviews on digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer published from database inception up to May 1, 2022, from PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. Eligible reviews conducted a systematic literature search. Data were extracted in duplicate via a pre-defined online survey. Following screening, 134 reviews met the eligibility criteria. 77 of those reviews were published since 2020. 128 reviews summarised interventions intended for patients, 18 addressed family caregivers, and five addressed health-care providers. 56 reviews did not target a specific phase of the cancer continuum, whereas 48 reviews tended to address the active treatment phase. 29 reviews included a meta-analysis, with results showing positive effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and screening behaviours. 83 reviews did not report intervention implementation outcomes but when reported, 36 reported acceptability, 32 feasibility, and 29 fidelity outcomes. Several notable gaps were identified in these literature reviews on digital health and telehealth in cancer care. No reviews specifically addressed older adults, bereavement, or sustainability of interventions and only two reviews focused on comparing telehealth to in-person interventions. Addressing these gaps with rigorous systematic reviews might help guide continued innovation in remote cancer care, particularly for older adults and bereaved families, and integrate and sustain these interventions within oncology.
Key Findings
1
Implementation outcomes were frequently missing; when reported, acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity were assessed in 36, 32, and 29 reviews, respectively.
2
Major evidence gaps included the absence of reviews focused specifically on older adults, bereavement, or intervention sustainability, and only two reviews compared telehealth with in-person care.
3
Meta-analyses reported positive effects of digital health and telehealth interventions on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and screening behaviours.
4
Most reviews focused on patient interventions (128), while fewer addressed family caregivers (18) or health-care providers (5), predominantly during active treatment.
5
Research activity accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 77 of the 134 reviews published since 2020.
6
The scoping review identified 134 eligible systematic literature reviews on digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer care through May 1, 2022.
Research Object
Digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer care
Research Subject
Characteristics, effects, implementation outcomes, and evidence gaps in the peer-reviewed review literature
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-04-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
269
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest