Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda
Результаты исследований внедрения: концептуальные различия, проблемы измерения и программа исследований
2010-10-18
SCID: 54.1/2kszpa4b
Discuss with AI
comparative effectivenessimplementation outcomesimplementation outcomes taxonomyimplementation researchimplementation strategies
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of "implementation outcomes" distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working "taxonomy" of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes-acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability-along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
Key Findings
1
It advances a two-pronged research agenda to improve implementation-outcome conceptualization and measurement.
2
It proposes a heuristic taxonomy of eight implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability.
3
Systematically studying implementation outcomes could clarify implementation processes, increase research efficiency, and enable comparative effectiveness studies of implementation strategies.
4
The paper distinguishes implementation outcomes from service-system and clinical treatment outcomes when evaluating successful implementation.
5
The paper identifies conceptualization and measurement of implementation outcomes as unresolved challenges in implementation research.
Research Object
Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, sustainability)
Research Subject
the conceptualization, measurement, and evaluation of implementation outcomes, including acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability
Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-10-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai1
Cited by7
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback2022
Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews2023
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions2019
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research2015
Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support2015
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks2015
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors2010