Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

Результаты исследований внедрения: концептуальные различия, проблемы измерения и программа исследований
Enola K. Proctor, Hiie Silmere, Ramesh Raghavan, Peter S. Hovmand, Greg Aarons, Alicia C. Bunger, Richard T. Griffey, Melissa A. Hensley
2010-10-18

comparative effectivenessimplementation outcomesimplementation outcomes taxonomyimplementation researchimplementation strategies
An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of "implementation outcomes" distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working "taxonomy" of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes-acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability-along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
1
It advances a two-pronged research agenda to improve implementation-outcome conceptualization and measurement.
2
It proposes a heuristic taxonomy of eight implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability.
3
Systematically studying implementation outcomes could clarify implementation processes, increase research efficiency, and enable comparative effectiveness studies of implementation strategies.
4
The paper distinguishes implementation outcomes from service-system and clinical treatment outcomes when evaluating successful implementation.
5
The paper identifies conceptualization and measurement of implementation outcomes as unresolved challenges in implementation research.

Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, sustainability)

the conceptualization, measurement, and evaluation of implementation outcomes, including acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability

Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-10-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Enola K. Proctor
Hiie Silmere
Ramesh Raghavan
Peter S. Hovmand
Greg Aarons
Alicia C. Bunger
Richard T. Griffey
Melissa A. Hensley
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%