The Superiority of Economists

Превосходство экономистов
Marion Fourcade, Étienne Ollion, Yann Algan
2015-02-01

authority and entitlementbibliometric databusiness school employmentconflicts of interestdominant position of economicseconomists' material situationexternal consultinghierarchical structureindividualist worldviewinsularity of economicspolitical critiquesuperiority of economiststop-down management
In this essay, we analyze the dominant position of economics within the network of the social sciences in the United States. We begin by documenting the relative insularity of economics, using bibliometric data. Next we analyze the tight management of the field from the top down, which gives economics its characteristic hierarchical structure. Economists also distinguish themselves from other social scientists through their much better material situation (many teach in business schools, have external consulting activities), their more individualist worldviews, and their confidence in their discipline's ability to fix the world's problems. Taken together, these traits constitute what we call the superiority of economists, where economists' objective supremacy is intimately linked with their subjective sense of authority and entitlement. While this superiority has certainly fueled economists' practical involvement and their considerable influence over the economy, it has also exposed them more to conflicts of interests, political critique, even derision.
1
Economics occupies a dominant, relatively insular position within the US social sciences network, as shown by bibliometric data.
2
Economists enjoy a superior material situation (many teach in business schools and engage in external consulting) compared to other social scientists.
3
Economists tend to hold more individualist worldviews and greater confidence in their discipline's ability to solve societal problems.
4
The field of economics is tightly managed from the top down, producing a characteristic hierarchical structure.
5
The superiority of economists increases their practical influence over the economy but also exposes them to conflicts of interest, political critique, and derision.
6
These traits combine into a 'superiority of economists' linking objective supremacy with a subjective sense of authority and entitlement.

The field of economics within the network of social sciences in the United States

Economics' dominant/insular position and hierarchical management plus associated material advantages, worldviews, authority, entitlement, influence, and exposure to conflicts of interest and critique

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Marion Fourcade
Étienne Ollion
Yann Algan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%