Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Интенсивный контроль уровня глюкозы в крови и сосудистые исходы у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2-го типа
Paul Glasziou, Bryan Williams, Mark Woodward, Bruce Neal, Stephen MacMahon, Neil R Poulter, Anthony Rodgers, Pavel Hamet, Diederick E. Grobbee, Simon Heller, John Chalmers, Anushka Patel, Bastiaan E. de Galan, Michel Marre, Stephen Harrap, Lisheng Liu, Laurent Billot, Séverine Bompoint, Mark E. Cooper, Changyu Pan, C. E. Mogensen, Anushka Patel, Giuseppe Mancia, Rohina Joshi
2008-06-06

glycated hemoglobinintensive glucose controlmajor microvascular eventsnephropathytype 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)
1
In 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes, intensive glucose control achieved a lower mean glycated hemoglobin level than standard control after 5 years (6.5% vs. 7.3%).
2
Intensive control reduced combined major macrovascular and microvascular events from 20.0% to 18.1% (hazard ratio, 0.90; P=0.01).
3
Intensive glucose control did not significantly reduce major macrovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality.
4
Severe hypoglycemia was more frequent with intensive control than standard control (2.7% vs. 1.5%; hazard ratio, 1.86; P<0.001).
5
The reduction in major microvascular events was driven primarily by lower nephropathy incidence (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; P=0.006), with no significant retinopathy effect.

Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing intensive or standard glucose control

The effects of intensive versus standard glucose control on major macrovascular and microvascular outcomes, mortality, and severe hypoglycemia

Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-06-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Paul Glasziou
Bryan Williams
Mark Woodward
Bruce Neal
Stephen MacMahon
Neil R Poulter
Anthony Rodgers
Pavel Hamet
Diederick E. Grobbee
Simon Heller
John Chalmers
Anushka Patel
Bastiaan E. de Galan
Michel Marre
Stephen Harrap
Lisheng Liu
Laurent Billot
Séverine Bompoint
Mark E. Cooper
Changyu Pan
C. E. Mogensen
Anushka Patel
Giuseppe Mancia
Rohina Joshi
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%