Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013

Стандарты медицинской помощи при сахарном диабете — 2013
2012-12-10
SCID:  54.1/d9jqbbvb Discuss with AI
DiabetesEvidence-based medicineMedical care standardsMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trials
Abstract (AI)
Clear evidence from well-conducted, generalizable RCTs that are adequately powered, including: c Evidence from a well-conducted multicenter trial c Evidence from a meta-analysis that incorporated quality ratings in the analysis Compelling nonexperimental evidence, i.e., "all or none" rule developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford Supportive evidence from well-conducted RCTs that are adequately powered, including:
Key Findings
1
Compelling nonexperimental evidence may qualify under the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine’s “all or none” rule.
2
Supportive evidence is recognized from well-conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trials.
3
The document presents evidence-grading standards for diabetes medical care, emphasizing well-conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trials.
4
The highest evidence category includes generalizable RCTs, multicenter trials, and meta-analyses incorporating study-quality ratings.
Research Object

Standards of medical care for diabetes

Research Subject

standards and levels of evidence for diabetes care recommendations

Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-12-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%