On the Foundations of Corporate Social Responsibility
Об основах корпоративной социальной ответственности
2016-12-06
SCID: 54.1/9ye26jvq
Discuss with AI
CSR ratingscivil lawcommon lawcorporate social responsibilitylegal origin
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
ABSTRACT Using corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings for 23,000 companies from 114 countries, we find that a firm's CSR rating and its country's legal origin are strongly correlated. Legal origin is a stronger explanation than “doing good by doing well” factors or firm and country characteristics (ownership concentration, political institutions, and globalization): firms from common law countries have lower CSR than companies from civil law countries, with Scandinavian civil law firms having the highest CSR ratings. Evidence from quasi‐natural experiments such as scandals and natural disasters suggests that civil law firms are more responsive to CSR shocks than common law firms.
Key Findings
1
Firms in common law countries have lower CSR ratings than firms in civil law countries, while Scandinavian civil law firms achieve the highest ratings.
2
Legal origin explains CSR ratings more strongly than profitability-related incentives, ownership concentration, political institutions, globalization, and other firm or country characteristics.
3
Quasi-natural evidence from scandals and natural disasters indicates that civil law firms respond more strongly to CSR shocks than common law firms.
4
Using CSR ratings for 23,000 companies across 114 countries, the study finds a strong correlation between corporate CSR performance and national legal origin.
Research Object
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) of firms from 114 countries, assessed using CSR ratings for 23,000 companies
Research Subject
Cross-country and legal-origin differences in firms’ CSR ratings and their responsiveness to CSR shocks
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-12-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest