Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond

Вопросы академической добросовестности при использовании больших языковых моделей в постпандемическую эпоху: ChatGPT и далее
Mike Perkins
2023-01-01

AI-assisted writingChatGPTacademic integrityautomated writing evaluationlarge language models
This paper explores the academic integrity considerations of students’ use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools using Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT in formal assessments. We examine the evolution of these tools, and highlight the potential ways that LLMs can support in the education of students in digital writing and beyond, including the teaching of writing and composition, the possibilities of co-creation between humans and AI, supporting EFL learners, and improving Automated Writing Evaluations (AWE). We describe and demonstrate the potential that these tools have in creating original, coherent text that can avoid detection by existing technological methods of detection and trained academic staff alike, demonstrating a major academic integrity concern related to the use of these tools by students. Analysing the various issues related to academic integrity that LLMs raise for both Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and students, we conclude that it is not the student use of any AI tools that defines whether plagiarism or a breach of academic integrity has occurred, but whether any use is made clear by the student. Deciding whether any particular use of LLMs by students can be defined as academic misconduct is determined by the academic integrity policies of any given HEI, which must be updated to consider how these tools will be used in future educational environments.
1
AI-assisted work is not inherently plagiarism or academic misconduct; the critical issue is whether students transparently disclose their use of AI tools.
2
Higher education institutions must update their academic-integrity policies to address the evolving use of LLMs in future educational environments.
3
LLMs such as ChatGPT can support digital writing instruction, composition teaching, human–AI co-creation, EFL learning, and automated writing evaluation.
4
These tools can generate original, coherent text that may evade existing detection technologies and trained academic staff, creating a substantial academic-integrity risk.
5
Whether LLM use constitutes academic misconduct depends on each higher education institution’s academic-integrity policies.

Students' use of AI Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT in formal academic assessments

academic integrity implications, including plagiarism detection, transparency of use, and the classification of LLM-assisted work as academic misconduct

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
789
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mike Perkins
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%